High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt.Noor Jan vs Ing Vysya Bank Ltd on 3 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Smt.Noor Jan vs Ing Vysya Bank Ltd on 3 November, 2010
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
  . rséisé :;Amd
 ' .»S'/0 _ta1;e~syed -Ibrahim @

IN THE HIGH COURT or RARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED 3":-us THE 3*" DAY or NOVEMBER 2010

BEFORE :
THE I-£ON'BI..E MRJUSTICE MO!-{AN snANTANA§¢Qb§Aa""'A.V
wan PETITIQN Ng.21§§§g2gQg (gM~2:)iz"rv).A'J:'"  

Bwn:

1. Smt. Noor Jan
D/o iate Syed Ibrahim @
Syed Biram
Aged about 38 years

2. Smt. Maqbool Jan

D/0 late Syed Ibrahim @_A_" " ;
Syed Biram .  '

W/0 Abdul Wajid 

Aged about    

3. Syed1'Me'E1ébo§§d':V:'V"-AA':%  

S/0 iate..Syed E'bra'h'im " 

@ Syed Bi-ruarn V __ V
Agégd" about 343/'ears'

'Aged abohjt 30 years
A'i'%._arefre.siding at
No.4.83«._and 483/1

  Annasahdra Paiya
 HA5, Post, Banga|ore--i7.

 (fig Sflri V.R. Kulkarni, Adv.,)

..Petitioners



8.9.9 I

1. ING Vysya Bank Ltd.,
No.23-4, Garudachar Complex
Chickpet, Bangalore--560 (353
Rep by its Branch Manager.

2. Syed Basha
S/0 late Syed All
Age Major

3. Syed Yosuf

S/o late Syed All

Age Major V  5
Respondents 2 and 3"are..   j,
Residing at No.-483 & 483/1  1
Annasandra Paiya 7   " ''
H.A.L. Post,;'Bang'alore--l;7-5 

4. Shamsundar,:'C3_0e|"'--- .  R" 

S/o Jag_adeeps'h'§?'raVsa.d" _ * " 

Age :lVla}'o'r;~P;'a_vrtni4'f:r' _  

M/s. 'Durga yE'riterp'rises_ 

No.7/1,, M.T. Stree~t_  __ it

2"" Cross, Chickpetg = "

Bangalore#S_6OVQS3."v.  ..Respondents
 {By  Mg;iR. =Szhashid'h'a'r", Adv., for R1)

it 'This .W:r.itl:;Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of

-the Constitution of India praying to set aside the orders
 'passed"by1~ the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Bangalore in ASA
" 'V.~rNo.23_3/2'009 on 14.7.2009 as per Annexure--A.

 This Writ Petition coming on for orders this day, the

 Coiart made the following :



ORDER

By filing this writ petition, petitioners have

quashing the order passed by Debt R€CQ’v’€ia’_:y:~.VVT’i%l:bLil’]r3l’:,u

Bangalore, in ASA.i\lo.233/2009 dated 14..,i,2o’o,91.’,,,’ T

In View of the availability of”a.lytern.at.iye Velificacious ‘V

statutory remedy of appeal of the
SARFAESI Act, this Cou’rt’é’_o’eeiai_n§es the writ
petition. Petition”fai’is._ancf:”the’ It is open
for the petitiorl’ers.__Vto’,: ijfietqtlllitecovery Appellate
Tribunal within’VA”fo’t;rV’i’1«;§geeks,*::thi.s”§dav. All questions are
kept open,’…”It– if petitioners approach the
Debt RecoveryafribuVnai.’4V\rritiai:rt’i’ four weeks from this day, the

v4,q.uestion.§:,t>tlimitation-Vs,ho_t;ld not be raised.

Sd/Q
Iudcj-“”