High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt P A Prabha D/O B P Anantha vs B P Krishnamurthy S/O Late B … on 14 December, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Smt P A Prabha D/O B P Anantha vs B P Krishnamurthy S/O Late B … on 14 December, 2009
Author: N.Kumar And C.R.Kumaraswamy
11! 'ms men COURT or mmamxa AT  %    ~ . 

mmnmrsnm men mvorr nEcmm3;g%jgoc§%F% %  *

PRESEHT

THE HONBLE m.w5"%QE%'fi 1  1 % 

THE norms  
REGULAR mas?  2003

1.

&£’I’.P.A.FR.AEI-ia ‘ ‘.
D] O
%
AGE!) _. ‘ ‘
C10 SRl;P.A.DHARREHDRA
110.10, SECOND’ ROAD
conss L.

_____
BmmE~sw ma

2.’

scan on m:.*B.r=.A:na1rrHA
Lk PABMMABHA
AGED 25 YEARS

. Raasmma yr 30. m
_ ‘ sscmrn mmm Ram
% ism caress. musswmm

kk {BY m21.12.3.sAm.s1vA1=Pa, AZJVFOR

mm mwuxr 01- KARNATAKA umm flaunt (BF KARNATAKA HIGH $0621’ 0? KARNAVAM Him-i CGURT OF KARNMAKA HIGH COURT OF MRNAVAKA MEG!-E C

M] 3.MAN-JULDEVI A3%CIA’I’ES, ADVS.)
ARE:

1. SRI.l’3.P.KI~EISI’BlAMUR’l’I’IY
SON 0? LATE B.PUTI’ANHA

mm!” mum W mxnmam-1-mm mt:gr=-GWARNATAKA H’!GH”COURT”0F ICARNATAKA 1-mm ‘co’un1’m= KARNA’l’Ai(A’ mm count as xA2m’rA’KiA HIGH ‘C

mm. crnr cxvn. mm :-mssxoas h
BANGALORE, DISMSSIHG Tm wrr

PAKHHON AND %PAl’-ZATE I-“C)S3ESSIOH.

mxs APPEAL ems on FOR
swan KtmmR.:.,m1.NEmn’nm «

Thh
anademeormetrsaxoourc the

mam of wheéule
are .as to the in the

” matter of the suit ‘3 Ty

No.19 smm at II Temple
,% Ema Wm 41 mtxertmao South 25 feet
plan and mum referred so an the
sgtmuxe pLrapm1.y’.

3. O1’g1na11y,t1ncac11em1l=propertybehongedto

um . Heuoldtheac1mdu1eprapcI1:yin\\’

EmurofBPut:tam1a~–g-andfatherofthe

W . ,,, sale and W

Puttanna is no more. He am i
Putnam hadwmflpmfan
of Sri Raghaveadra mo 3

retained only a 1m-&m ¢£
meaaurmg mt no met 41 25
fast. favnur of
1 ‘ ‘ possession and

ezfioymarfifif till his death

of the family i.e.,

.,.em, or Puttanm, the other
V wet: ha. joint posseaaim, of the
r if and son ofB P Ammthapadmanabha

son of tin Puimmza — 2″‘ de&ant in

The ma ofthe pzmm 3 that am the

man mwwm wr TNMKNAIRRR mun E” Q!’ KARNATAICA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNAYAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

d:aathofPu1:tnm,plair1tfia1::ial1thad&z1<ianm
have amuired title, posamakm and intmmt in the
achadukpropertyhaaamrfiarmwiththepauvhioxsx

am-4 emum-W ammmp.-M H'!*GH"€§3t§RTflF=1€ARNA'¥AKA' H!GH'COU!lT'tJF"KRRNATAKA"H165-I C'0l§R1""0F'l(ARMATAKA' HIGH Comm' '5? KARNATAKA HIGH' c

of Secfim 6 of tho: Hindu ' Act
aurvam-ampupmthe L
parmaxxahmce, the pxasnm A ]

are eanfitledto a. dame:

aclmachzh    and

 

boums. It is Qgti      It is

 

 L     may of
the plaizfi   about three

  ofhy the other 00--

M trymto act m a prejudic1al’
umaatmpmibuvn” ‘ ,the
_ d%wrfltimoft1wauit
are in fawn: of efiacting panaam, an

aamehasnotbaendone, ‘l’hm’efa’a,theplain1:ifl’a

have fiat! a suit for parmon and separate

of their hgililnate share in tb suit ‘ u V’

4. 2nd aermaun has filed AT % ff
admtfmg the allegafiom in

7, 33,10 and 11 in the
1-: defendant has release
supposed in
wmmm rim propmy
m m or % mm 1…

to a civil suit my the
fied supposed tn have
jifisauour ofthe 1:: defendant is

1.3 and 4 have filed a pm

wwm amwmma wr wsmmnanaxn rmau €…Af.3!;,!,;l<! £3?' KARNAIAKA HMLEH CQUR"? OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

.mm 1:. They mnnezxi the suit is mum' by
the 233 dafmdam. 121%' spew mm '3 that 2"
d:%dnn1hasre1eused1n'sahareofp:ropm'tyi:1fiavuur

ifim mum" M mmA'rmA- Hma;£'=c§:m-m M K»'mNA'l'Al(A man" c'ou'sz'r as KARNAYAKA I-flfil-¥'G@UR1"'0F KARNATAKA HIGH 'c:mm'- mu Knmnmm 'HIGH 1:

respective’ share. mseveaby the

doc:-aqtfmplaintfiarefizappanl.

9 I-earned counsel «P96-I1 %fiar’=h€”1@ “j %
Sri R 3 Sadaamvappa

judgment and
schedule property ‘as oe-
Even if by that
am
of the Hes ammo: give up
the there are not partiaa tn

rm deed is not binelim an
comzmitmd a swinrua war in

: plahufi.

L A “1§}.v Per comma, hamad oaunnal appem-am for
submittnd 2″‘ d End a suit
mnauon of the mace ma. Howcm.-.r., a

¢:amatnhed’u1z3isaedsawithdrawn. ‘I’he:’«£nre,the
prawt wit far partifion without aeekixg for
mmflh&n&&mmImaddafi$mt

WW mwm” 0? KARNATAKA Hififi OF KARNATAKA HIGH CGHRT OF KQRNATAKA. Hififl COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR? 0F KARNATAKA H36!-3 C’

31

deed aama 5.9.1953 mm one Krhlmappa. It %
uelfiacquhhinn. Subsequently, he um um *
the pmpetty prurclmsed R1 favour
and yet amthsr portion in hymn; A

retained the suit schedule
mama-ed 41 feet by 21%:%£g,g, 1i.S.i9a4
intestate. ‘lhcn’e.fm-5, propm-my
mm on 8 of *1»
Hindu deamam – B P

schedule km inmteat m favour

\\ pf mrnideratinn of Ra.70,0GO[ —

% the plain: and me 2nd emenaanz

A %% — admits the same and it is on mom that

{ he filed a suit for cazzieafiatiancn of the
. V documr.-rm whiahwas withdrawn. Wm am: the

2′”‘déezxia:11:macuh$are&msadaedar:dwithdrew
flzeamtmedclmfisifinmwzztiaanoftmrelwse

tifitztnwlmtzzvex-@1m,thatre1ea.se

mm ::.:mm¥ W mmmnxa mm»: cg-um” as KARNATAKA 2-mu mum as KARNAYAKA W9″ COURT 0!’ KARNATAKA H16″ COURT 0?’ i<MNAW<A HIGH C4

*9

12

At any rate. hehaam right in the

hehasrelaauad

property in an

with their
co-parcm’ has &

9 his share as a in no
way ‘gum ; . .m

in the cm their abuse to
be to them. If, it was
a A% ‘ % « of the cha@ in kw,

_hy 1:: the smmsan Act by

_ _ and new aflm zoos, the
i such a law ‘ flrw

3. mmmm as a c:c–mmmer, they were
m cmmmg the 1-gm. They get 3. mm in use

gnuputyonlyiftmacmdulepropatyinaar
par%p1’opert)r.O ,fixa5rhauemr’?ghtby
birthaxfithepropm-tyd$not devalvetry

R ///f
/,

ms mm”; W KARNATAKA mm: c;:vu.R1 ow mmggxrnm HIGH mun’: or KAMMAKA HIGH cow: 0% KARNATAKA mm! mam” OF KARNATAKA men Q

5′
~;

$

aurviwaramp. The evidanoe on reaord ~

mgmma me deed. It is not a

Pmpm-ty which dawned on
eoupwl with the ma Prom
cam-nacho It 53
& After suofi
panama», he nab deeds in
favour of arms were not partim.

those

Qgniaoquximn and in mm of h’n
uokl two pm-wm of the property
A A — the seheduie pmm-gr. RH; died in 1984-.
dim, has pa-apmy éesmlues so: %
% A sumac»: Act an fauna: of em -I heirs.

Tbefimziuanarnignndaugmm-af¢.sonwm’ma1iva,
hnotaeiaea—Ihai1’aadolass~Ihaa&r’mch1:lesa}1
utlm lmirs. ‘1’®’&x’:a,w1mPuttnmmdied,it7n

awn mwwm us” NAKNAERIKR mam OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH (SOUR? Q? KARNAVAKA HIGH C

five mm and three daughtheta as class –
succeeded in tin eumte of Puttarxrn. H
:19 right in the pnopmy by

rfiht only out of the& i.é.’-..

though the trial Cefiurt Somewhat
dfiaem reached by
the trial this mm-

A- the any the? M *1»
auit, the diazmaiA by the trrialcourt

. ‘V of the maxim’, we do natsae any

” lilo: coda.

Sc1/ –

JUDGE

Sd/-3;

Judge