1 WPI 1049.08 11! ms area coma' or smmcnmrm AT nwcmwm mmn mm mm 1313 mm! or wausr. zoos my-ans: * " ms Hoxrnm MR. JIISTICE mr. snnmmm; mi: Pegjfign Ng.1 1049 at ggos {g_s-_g£;$j V v _ ' n _B_;¢t_I_!..;¢.;e;.m " ._ 1 SM!' P SRIDEVI w/0 P RAMAKRISHNA AGED 41Y§:ARs R/O No.79-D, zsr CROSS RR. LAYOUT, NANDI DURGA ROAD BANGALORE - 560 oj4&_ 2 SR] N ADINARAYANA ' V -. s/o LATE BAPANAIAH _ AGED 71 '(EARS I , ' 3 sn€1*'r€RAnE;ANL}§3}jAa.af3aA.j" _ w/--.r;> N_An1N2am_»Y.a._NA%._T - AGE!) 67 YEARS * .. 4 N YOGAHMD V' -_ ' .. sxo :1 ADINARAYANA »AQED 35 YEARS... ..... .. - . 'v ., P2 '_I'O,F'4<VARE R/0 No.4/3, T ABIJ'£TH»v A1?_A;~":frMENTs ._ "-'.vEN1§A?E:--':a&A LAYOUT A NAGASHW? I-IALL1, "-BAI~§&A:.oRE-569094 PETITDNERS {By Sri. N R Kxishnappa, Adv.] mun...-..:_ -- £-E '1'HE JOINT REGISTRAR op' CO OPERA"I'IVE SOCIETIES URBAN BANK F'EDERATf0N 140.132, K.I-{ROAD BANGALORE}-560027 3 WPI 1049.08 tribunal, has been unceremoniously dismissed" tribunal; that given some breathing time, more than Willing to pay, if not entire amolmti of the amount determined and in matter warrants examination.___ and V' r court. 3. Sri. Krishnappa, the petitioners would very tpetitioners -- appellants ' ready and wining to abide Tribunal may impose for of the recovery proceedings which. eminent in the auction sale of the the petitioners on 28.8.2008; that fact are even now ready to pay or deposit at least the amount to avoid such consequences. V' it I find there is absolutely no scope for .___'"'."i11teI'fere11oe in a matter of this nature, the respondent -
V it Bank who had lent the amount to the petitioners and has
now obtained Award against the petitioners has entered
4 WP1 1049.08
caveat and Sri. Srinivas Rao, learned counsel appefaying
for the respondent – Bank very graciously if
the petitioners as indicated aboveehould”de§e~eit::509/£z;of~~
the amount due under the auction notjeeé date
fxed for auction, the res{ioI1§ienfs~._ xivifl press the *
auction notice for execution: it is« t_ to the
petitioners to take adfian.tage–.ofw;fi3ie” of the Bank.
5. While not warranting
interference, of the respondent
.. Bank is It
6. It is for avail of the same and if
they toevoid «the auction sale to deposit 50%
of the proposed date.
Sd/-
Judge