Smt Padmavathi vs Smt N Jayalakshmi on 24 November, 2008

M.F.A.NO.10225]20{)'?'
-1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

nxrsn mm THE 24" on or novnwmn 2008 
am-'om V

THE Hownm lb!R.JU8TICE n.G.RAmmgt§1  ' 1[;-i  * 

M.F.A. NO. 1022512991  ~ 
BETWEEN:   

1 SMT PADMAVATHI , 
AGEE ABOUT 40 ms  ' _ "
W/O LATE sm J K NARAYANASWAMY
@ NARAYANASWAMYAF-'PA PRE_SEN_'i"L.Y
R/AT NAKKANAHALLI 'J.ILI.A=GE  _ V 
SRIRAMPURA PO31'  " 2 2;»  

CHIKKABALLAPURTQ -- :  
KOLAR DIST     '  APPELLANT

(BY M/S .%c;.TsU'i«;£jr»i}3.::;AN 3;  "  

Ass€>c1ATE$»,__,Apvs. -._A"B_.'.-"s§'.m'.}

D:

2 SMT N JA'mLAKSHN£.£ 

"AGED. ABOU1-'._#}5 YRS
- W/Q..[sRI%_ N GOPALMRISHNA

« _ !{YA'£'§-ifi_BE'.12AVESHWARA NILAYA

 ":~:o.-{aw 'ESAHUBALINGAR M E 3 ROAD

»;-BA£€(31%LCRi'=.--_1'3

2 -SR1 PURUEBHOTHAMA
sgo "LA'I"i*3 SR1 PILLAPPA
 AGEDTABOUT 50 ms .
.. , }_{YA'I"£~§ABYRAVESHWARA NILAYA
" V NQ664 BAHUBALINGAR
*--:.:*E s ROD BANGALORE 13

V%   .3  SRI SHIVA RAMU

S/O {ATE SR1 PILLAPPA
AGED ABOUT 40 YRS
KYATHABYRAVESHWARA NILAYA

 



M. F.A.NO. 10225] 2007
- 2 -

NCL664 BAPIUBALINGAR
M E S ROAD
BANGALORE 13

SR!' .1 s CHELUVAMURTHY
s/o LATE SR1 J K SETPAPPA

AGED ABOUT 56 YRS V  :
R/AT NO1084 '?TH BLOCK 8TH (moss. A' 
I-{MT LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA 
BANGALORE 97 

SR1 J s SATYANARAYANA  .._

S/0 LATE SR! J K SE'1"I'APPA  *

AGED ABOUT 50 YRS   

R /AT NO. 1084 7TH BLOCK 8TH 'cRQSs._
HMT LAYOUT VIDYAh'AblYAI?UF?jx '- ' *
BANGALORE 97    

SRIJSUMAPATHY  _  
s/0 LATE $3121 SE'l"TAPPA  ;. V
AGED     
R/AT No.._1es4;7TH' '-BLOCK .8'l"H caoss
HMT-L.AYO¥J_T V*i3;>YAE2;3EIYé\Pl3.E-1:45. 
BA?;'~lGALO'r3E.,97  ,  .

SR1  .R--      
S/O SR1? J -K ¥'2fisMA§3' EANDRAIAH
AGED ABOU'}' gems  "

1?;/' £'1'T_ N0. 168% 7TH BLOCK 8TH CROSS

 V. «_ V_"Ei'MT__LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA
 _ 'BANGALORE 97

" _,SRE Qi'  Ki?:$1¥;NAMuRTHY
_ 'S_fO SRi_~J  RAMACHANDRAIAH
A AGED A303? 43 ms

/AT N013} SEETHARAM INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE MES ROAD JALAHALLI

.A ; BANGALORE 13
= .,_s§:I .5 re ANAND

S] O SR1 J K RAMACHANDRAIAH

% AGED ABOUT 37 ms

R/AT 240.131 SEFJTHARAM INDUSTRXAL
ESTATE MES ROAD
JALAHALLI BANGALORE 13

 



M.F.A.NO.10225/2007
- 3 -

:0 SR1 LAKAPPA

s/0 LATE sm MARAPPA

may ABOUT 55 YRS

BHOVI conom

BAHUBALINAGAR

JALAHALLI

BANGALORE'. :3 

11 Sam ARJUNLAL Pm-{ALIA

AGEE) ABOLJT 60 YRS

s/0 SR1 VIRDHE CHAND  _

R/A'? VIMAL JEVIELLERS '

M.S RAMAIAH ROAD

GOKUL

BANGALORE 54

12 MRS RITA -- V 
AGED A;:ac}UT.4o YRS,-'"  ; 4'
mo SR1" SANTHCVSHEMENQN    'V

13 RAHUL §vIEs~J_1~z"v-v--I'_,_  
S/O MRS. RITAAND'   '_
3/0', samesn '¥i~;E1NON 
AGE: 13 Yii'»-'3,  _  .
SINCE M1No1+:.REP.%¥3Y~V_H'13 ' -
FATHER as NA'}'URA.L'GU'1'.RlDIAN
SR1 SARTOSH Mmfisora 

RESPQNDENT NOS.1".?. & 13 _
;R~*,(AT NO. 162 5"FH...A~--.CROSS
- A 'sUN'DAR'"w'AGAR
.VwQoKUL~,',
" V TBANGALORVE   RESPONDENTS

{ BY S RI P REDDY, ADV. FOR C/R-11;
“R-1 P410 86 R-12′ SERVICE HELI) SUFFECIENT)

n TTH§s..m’A FILED 11/0. 43 RULE ma 0? cpc AC’:AINS’I’

A YEJRDER DT. 11.7.2007 PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 IN
O;S.N{}._9’542/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDL. CITY CIVIL

-A-NL’ SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, (CCH.NO.19),
” REJEC-“I’I1’§G TI-IE IA FILED (1/0. 39 RULES 1 AND 2 OF’ CFC

-. Ft??? ‘I’.I.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY.
THE COURT DELJVERED THE FOLLOWING:

M.F.A.NO. 102251200′?

g_:1.p_m_g_§.n1 %
None appears for the appellant to
appeal, though the appeal is ca1Ie§i…:fo_1f
Hence, the appeal stands :i.
prosecution.

‘-» TI1’dcg’e