HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COHMITTEE, BANGALORE
BEFORE THE LOX ABALA1'
IN THE HIGH comm' or KARNATAKA. AT .,
DATE!) Tms mm 24": DAY 05* waver, zaiio, :1:
conzcxnurrons PREvfiEfi'»'£':« H " " 4
HGWBLE MR. JUSTICE I-I.8.KE'MI'ANN'A_ ' ._ « ~
sm. K.SURE8H,.p&E:1HBEi@,
Z$
Lok Adalat' ~80. 1:136;-3eV1e._
BETWEEN: _ ._ AA
SMT.PARVATHAMM;A._, V
W/<3-'MAHANTHADEVARU, ' ' = "
AGEDABOUT43 YEARS, 3
RESIDENTOF DEJDDAGERE, _ _ . «
MYSORE'; TALUK. ..4u»m:.:..ax'r
_ {BY . Ii} a_. 'P§ré';§frga§.'..'IJ ainvocamsj
1.
SR}. v.PRAsAN:s;A’ Kumk, = ” —
MAJOR, RESiDE1’§’_f CF . A ”
HOSATH£R[JMAKOC~DAifi.I..’-
‘1’.NARASE§_PUR’A TALUK, _
.. ” IEgYSOEE’£3[$f?R;.; ‘ ” ‘ ….. .. V
2. ‘THE NEW 1N.DiA£’xSS”L.i_RA£’ECE:
-::'<.'::_M?,VssT_1~r&' T.:.;1::_1V'1'EI:),..T_
No.' 1.3;-2, FIRST ..13f1;3.<;f):"3fEr) 30-09-2005 PASSED {N MVC NO.’?i3f2(}06 ON THE FILE 01? THE
‘ Am);-‘}71QNA:.; DLSTRICT JUDGE, FAST TRACK, c:ou::z’1*~1v AND AD£>1..;vIAc:’1’, MYS(‘)RE,
‘”= PAR’i’L_Y” A-LLGWINQ THE CLAIM PETITEON FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKENG
: ElZ’J}£ANCEMENT GE COMPENSATION.
K! TEES APPEAL COMING ON FCJR CONCELMTEON BEFORE LOK fi;DAi.A’I’ AFTER
BEING REFERRED VIBE ORDER DATED 01–07–2010, THE F{“)LiA3WiNG
CONCILiATK3N ORDER [8 PASSED. CV
¢”‘
COKCILIATIOH ORDER
Heard.
2. This is a case cf The Tribunal taking
that the appellant sustained. fracture of.;}:1i:=;__¢1ax*ii§1é’ ” 3-; ”
campensation of Rs.20,800/ ~ with inte1¥:=.st1’_’aAt’iV per. ”
axmum from the date of pefition
for the appellanbclaimaxit atggl the Cxampany
have agreed to settle the _ compensafion of
Rs.1o,0oo/- (Rupees _ r-;-,n addition to the
compensation. aweg.rd¢;d__ the f . ‘ 2
3. The ” wéis directed to deposit the
enhanced Within six weeks from the
date of receipt dVf>r;py failing which the said amount
at; A from the date of default, tin the date of
dcI$*~3i:…f–» * ”
have filed a Joiiit Memo fiuly signed by the
The Joint Memo is taken an record. Oiiice is
jéo ‘c%raw the award accordiuglgt.
sdl-9..
311599
Sal.
mug