Smt Pramila Vithal Pednekar, vs Smt Pushpa K Pai on 9 June, 2008

 53 srvrr GEIZTASANDARND NAIK

IN was man coum or KARBIATAKA.    ~
DATED THIS THE 911% my on Jlmm   Y 
um:-can V' Q A' * 1 
-mm Hormm MR. JUSTICE *a§o1iAz1 R§Di§fi 

RP No 56 gr

BETWEEN

1 SMT PRAMILA \:n1’1;1AL.P13D1§E:«:AR;”~V’jjV-_V’ %
AGED 68 YEARS ..

occ; HOUYSE H’eLD-AT PR-ES-E_I\”_I”i’JiL.’
R/PTOLE NAi{A;–§a1\iADAi,Li’v.POS’T
TALUK KARWAR ‘
UTTARA KANNA33A.,DIS1’§§IC§’. _ _*

i 4 PETI’I’l0NER
(By Sri T M NADA}? mvo¢m%% )

Arm _ V’ V

1 v?i3SH}féA ‘K.1§AI
A(}Ei) MAJQR,f=
REG=D.OWN_ER op MARUTHI (mm

3 R;0.QpARTERs NO.D-3,SOLARIS,
‘-<{HEMTE¢H,B1NAvA,xARwAR.

~ THE DWISIONAL MANAGER
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE co.1:rD.,
DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
% KARWAR.

AGE MA.JoR,c>wrmR op TEM_}°Q,
; \

‘K

The Review Pefition is accordingly rejected and aj:-

consequence, application stands rejected.

csg