Smt Puttatayamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 May, 2008

Karnataka High Court

Author: Subhash B.Adi

OURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUKJ §.;)l!'._I£AKNAlAKA Hm'-H cuuul Ur KAKNAIAISA mar: Luau: UI' IKAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

.-1...

EH THE Hlgi CCIURT £33' EP*.R1'I.=&'ﬁsKA AT BAEGALORE

EATER THIS mm 2?" DAY 91? MAY, 2:305

BEFORE

'rm HQWELE I-m.J'EIS'I'ICE SEIBI-IASH 34.1)':  V

'3'R.L.RP. W. 1436/230'?

BE".i"i!IEE*i' :

Stat. Puttataymaa

Ivi',:"-:3 Late } 
Aged about 65 years,

Fgaaisiing at Earrmhalli jfi3.lage, ~..V  A

Kangexti. I-icabli, _   
Bangalore Scuth  V . 

mm:

 " .  ..,ﬁEEtI*3§.or1ER

:3': SM.   ﬁbvcstévfﬁ}

1.

The State sfaf ‘

Eidadi Poliéq 3?.;atiVon*,~ *

Biciaai ,. ra «

Rmnagazg’ m,stri::*..?:a.’ ” ”

2. H “”” H
S_ft»._ ”

Kaiziz-“ai-‘3P’§ X

‘.Mi1d&2.2na;.

“45 years.

-- ._ A      alatha.
  '  f9i'__f€3' Ikémmamhappa,
 Fagin'-I-ahatat 25 yeara.

 N<::3.2 to 4

Sim msicling at
Emmhalﬁ Village,



Kengexi Hobli,

Bangalmze S$uth Taluk. mEES§dﬁﬁ§RTS

This Criminal Raviaien Petitiﬁn $5 filed’
under Sectiﬁn. 401 9f the Cad$~-§f_*$rimiﬁ&l’W,
Pracedure, praying ta call=f¢r tha reccrﬁs inf
c..c:.. B-3:1:-.Ei95J2DO3 dated 1e2.o3%.T2j::so’4 “by-L.t1m.%%%c2g::a£ %

Judicial Magistrate, Bangélézé Rurai,Di3§ti¢t;

Bangalwre and aet {aside ,the jﬁﬁgment am&

canvict and aanteneedRtha xé3g¢ndant”Eb$.2 tn
4′ _V. ?_.

J
This Criminal]!Eatitipmf,¢mming an farw
Adisaion _this’mdayy. théﬁ €¢u:t made the

f9l1awing;r_»_ 1

of aheut 1291 days in

filin§g_thié_aEévi§i¢n. Petition. The reason

.\…H..I|u vr sxnuuvnunnn nuun \..\Julu s._:-rjxnnwnunnn ruun yuan: ur nnluvnlnlxn Hlurl LUUKI Ur KAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

1.;_r_g’a::i of delay is that, the

ﬁeti:isﬁe#’,w$$ _und¢: imgreesion that, the

TR; Staf&f§iii $il§ an appaal and yrmsacute ths

]_aama, §hQugh°%he maﬁa effort ta get the apyeal

Ufi£eu;gsi£aa the aypsal is net filad by the

3.:-.ja.tA;a~,7t1?:.a*.s Revisian 5.5 filed.

*Li{ fhara is ns justifiable raaaan. far

Vcandoming the inardinata delay. Even assuming

Uulu Ur KAI(NAIAi_U\ HIUH LUUKI q.r3sAKNAIAnA I-nun-I Luum Ur KAKNAIAIUI HIUH count!’ or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

us…-

that, the patitione: trieczi. to get theV.–appeal

filed. $3; the Gcavaxtnzaent, that dares

that, aim wag pracrluded frtsm

Eavisian ﬁatitimn. I=$mV~i2*a’*e:i5f_act:.a§é:3r_ Vx:e§::5}.;=;’>.3»j’ A’

are given for the inGr&i:13Va€–éA”dei&_ff’~in

this Revieican. I ncsé V..gé:z.~:;>:;i.”v_: i-sééaiﬁcﬁs ta

ctnndana the rial

3. S’s,cc:;::z:diz1gly,,_ I.A,… A .:”..3 ‘.”.v!.”:£é”‘_V’:3 §,’%”ﬁ;-‘f:$<li and

cansaquéntly, H tgw. . '1i.*.e'3;r.{si«;§n. " "Piaﬁ:ition is

dis-amisza ed .. -~

Sd/Q}
Iudgté

Leave a Comment Cancel