IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT _
DATED Tms THE 23% DAY {3fl?€f»V()CYI'(‘}B”E1’:~”{‘_§V.?::'(‘)'(‘.:IV:<9'~ _ é %
PRESENT '. ._ . & .
THE §{ON’BLE MR. J:Js=r1t3E_.f3 %
THE HONBLE 2A;.S.:»«I:3{)PANNA
:REVI1jzv PI~’:fI’I*’1fI'( 3:~§taIV_:N(;’.;.–_’E-1,?.V*,3’GO9
SMT’. R:.cHAN’r;RAMMA W’/’«<.3 SRL T RAMANNA
AGED ABO':')'I" 4:? 'YEARS 1- ' '
R/AT Nc}.=93/2, 'z§'=f'f':%f;10r3_1§<;»»«.
2% cR0sS';%$'FH_MA1N,A.2NE BLOCK
KAN§{fi.NAPAL"'YA, JAYAFJAGAR
BANILE-§&LGRE ~—11~..___ _ PETITIONER
{gar.s£zI}% §::gN{L::.;Aj:'AL1J ASSOCIATES, ADVS.)
V A . 1 Tr:.EmfiMM1ssIoNER
EAN:.C?rALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
.. EAJNGALGRE
?2._ °*:'HE DEPUTY (I:OMMiSSiC1E\¥ER
BANG2'-§L(3RE S(3U'i'H
BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
JAXANAGAR El BLQCK
8&1? GALORE} 1 1
:3 THE REVENUE OFFICER
BANGALORE} MAHANAGARA PALIKA _
WARE M). 39, GOODS SHED.RE)A¥3 I
BANGALORE I ' ~ "
TEES PETITICIN {S FILED-4._U/o”’47″‘:2UL3′”:,,;OF cjpc;
PRAYAENG 31133 REVEEW OF THE} “(‘)RI)E§€V.DA’?jE:’D 1–,1.8*;’2oo8
PASSES gm WA. N0. 296,107. * ._
This petition cériiing 01:3; Qrders this day,
V. GOPALAGOWl}A_.3′., mack: t1;s’fo11o_i.fvi1;g
VA mm % R’
._a.-.__.-<_–..::_.–.–
E330 §'§'i2I_} C3' .ié=: maéé out far reviewing {ha order,
' 'E'£?1'E§C–1'£' .5a'a&,ght i:i} "1Kiié reviewed. Therefsre, there is me
's'-;§.VVivfi§S~fi€lC:1T''-.._'£Qi'' % x1<i3ti€€ on the appficaficsn far
mzié.,3na_..t':io:I 1§'.w' AT of delay: Further, no satisfactary
"'«._ V?c3:;p}a::éiii{313 is ofiered in the afiidavit to candone the
A Eienca, Exéiigczfivi, 6539/2009;' is rejected:
\\/
Consequently, the review :"1'j£+:titi(;r;1..A
dismissed.
IUDGE
> j — V.
{EDGE