High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Rabiyabi vs Smt B M Susheela on 31 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt Rabiyabi vs Smt B M Susheela on 31 March, 2008
Author: H.G.Ramesh
W.P. No.§_255;2oo7

nu ma man comer or Iumwmu A-1'   %

nxrmn mm nu: 31-1' on or  = 
~ 11!: Human: uxausntzl rm;

nwrwnnu:    

1 SMTRABIYABI  :  " '
w/0 M ANWAR KHAN"  
D/O ALIKHAN % % V
AGED 534YEA.RS{  .
HOUSEH0!1;D'W'0RK€  _ 

R/A "BEHIND, 1-"¢oPL;=w2.,.R.Ir:i::..MILL

HONNAL1;EROA--D  = V'  

SHIMO.GAé.;_;577 20.1. * _ 

 .3'; Hicnm. (AMENDED v.c.o.
I  ~ %  ~ DATED 21.8.07)

 *1(a.}' $121  _'
" x 5/0' LATEMIKHABOOB KHAN
" AGED 30 ""-7._:.'-"eR_$=

'V :14 Avi'm_ Inuu
'.5; 

' ¢. "r--..-,1 " nngfimn rm mom I: vunu
  ¢'I.!:.|Il.'l% I.1IlJ'Il.I'l I'rII"I'
,0 ANWAR HAN
':t..i\nr\ a1 am 'on
' i  IJI» l'Jn"\3

" _ iii) HABEEB KHAN

 S/O ANWAR KHAN
AGED 29 YEARS

le; PAS}-{A _
S/0 ANWAR KHAN
AGED '28 YEARS

{f)  SHABEEEW Ki-ii\i\I'IJ'fi
w/o mreoz KI-IAN '
AGED 45 'ffifififi



- 2 ..
 F I1'0."fZa"5/2l'iL"i7

ALL ARE RESIDING AT

BEHIND POPULAR RICE MILL T T
HONNALI ROAD _       
SHIMOGA -- 577 201  PEf'1fI_'_l'!Qi_ilE§RS-« H

(BY sm G LAKSI-IMEESH RAO, ADV.)
mm:   

1 SMT B M SUSHEELA
WIQ B MALATHESH

AGED :29 YEARS
:2.,rs:r  mun

III-I-CUIII

191' CROSS, 2'0 MAIN
B.A.PU-.!!NAG.'.R

SI-IIMOGA 577 *.      R§;9,;¢NDEm
(BY SR1 svPRAKAsH.A1:m    AX 

THIS w121'r;jj>n2:'rrrI::$N  1*'eId1d4:.3:a  UNDER ARTICLES 225 AND
227 09'  eo:€e*a'rrLvmod' es?  epemzeee To QUASH
THE enema ~m,22..9.'o6' pdssen -BY--. THE cover on» THE am)
ADDITIOPEAL ed:-2:11. JUL'GEff{S;'%'.'a}I'v'}SION} saedem 1.-at 
No.35/o5_deANn "3'?"1:,€05 AS .__PER ..dm14Ex-A AND THE ORDER
DT.23-€3.35 eases 3'.-' THE cove'? 05% we :'ufiBi"i"I0iiAL I.'.':I'v'iL
June:-;~_uR.9Md.:em<firewood on IA No.1 m o.e.No.19a/05

ONL'.' he so F'AR=..é'i$ *2 faeszsee OF' "W-'demons, as PER
ANNEX-B ._IN _REePEc:*r 'oz? sun' arm NOAS4 MEASURING
3o'x4 SITUfi_(PED .-.13 Afifis'-;_Lfi'fAh'fiKERI, 

.  THIS PE'f"i's'.'i0fi .C0iviiNG FGR F-RF;LimNA"Rv

" '  . HEARIN,GTHl S DAY, 'i'HE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

hidun-1 mi on by the L-.Re M' + -

-- .3. -3:» In luv-uu-Inn

..'I ..1_._J.'~l.l.I'

V'-».p1l1lIlLl1;[__ ;ii'1  suit in o.s.No.193/2605 mm the
  of the Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.)., smmoga is
  against the common order dated 22.9.2006

(Annexure-A] passed by the Lower Appellate Court -

&x\g)//



'ALP. !1lQe5255!2QQ'.7

by the respondentidefendant and 7 

appeal in M.A.No.37/2005 filed. by ”

plaintiif; the aforesaid appeals Vlweiie

interlocutory onder L’

names-r’I I’ll] fhn ‘I1-In} r~n1n~l- i fhg ‘ nah’-1″ is!)-If :1
11159992 II’, BIA’! I-I-II-Ial Ill ,-Ln ,4 $1.315.

the appiication-mi piainm
under Order ‘Iv-l.9j grant of an
order “ao_:ogoittst the defendant
in respect

2. counsel appearing for
the ‘ana%e the orders at Annexures-A &

—nu—-vi-‘— —–n

V” fG;jV%’I_~,_l::_zh_vroeA¢_Aasl1 Rae, 1::-A.a.I.r.r1_r.ar_l eon In-I n

___1.__ _I_

A :-\_e A 1 r 1-: 1 _ _ ._ .1 _ I n
31″.! :5.V.l”I’&!£B8I1, lcfinlctl GO1lIlBO.l I01′

t1to’«–. respotttiont jointly submit that the writ petition

may liitiisposed or by direcflng both the parties herein
status-quo in respect of the suit pmoperty

the disposal. -2’ the am 9.116. 1*-.~-_rt_m_a_r «.1i_r-can-.g 2,-nth

q-vi–an

WV

-4-

E

_c_ee_z lzcenrcizz -.o- L. ,1.-… up any wnawawsn an

F

LI. …_

me suit the disposal of the suit. 5
submit that the parties will fully on-operaatgé
trial court for expeditious 4 V’

accordingly pray for a

(llama of .119 S1… axmfluitictaéi’-‘_;%.

3. In View of the al§wIe, followihfioltlert

1) both the to
mai;r1t~é1i;;.st£;!tus;§Quo«..ii£ of the suit
pmpen;» of the suit in

they are

_’ putting up any
suit property till the

3 = months thc (LL. .1′
. .1’éQ,:=.i’pt/ production of a co y of this orde .