High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Ramayamma vs Sri Kuppuswamy on 11 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Smt Ramayamma vs Sri Kuppuswamy on 11 March, 2009
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
 , §3el1z;31y Dist-o"1.~  7'

-1-

IN THE HIGH couar or KARNATAKA  V 

CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARM/AD""'    F-   5I   V %  

DATED THIS THE 11*" my (3F_)§'.éA3'éCF¥'--  

aEFo%RI:'i??£f%kf[%   %
HON'BLE M123usT1cE n;oH;A§iks;4.A§§ATAt§:AeoL1DAR
WRIT 
Between:      

1.

w/o Late Sxi”Pu}}ai;a11 _
Aged a’bo1H;”4?. –. ‘
Fruit; Vendor _ ”

Morcgalli,” Bazar ” .

°~ 2.

__ {V ti
~.Agr:.:d a;bm;.:._4Q’ -years
§’r§_.1it Ve_13dc}«1′,’ :

Mcirzgajli, Bazar,

” _. ~E3c:l’lary”})ist«01. .. Pcfitionexs

‘ By Sri H.Ka11tha Raja fin S.S.Yadran;1i, Advcoates )

u 3 Kuppuswamy

SI 0 Kuppuswamy
Aged about 56 yezars

Arehaka«~cuzn~Trustee
Of Kari’m.ari Temple
Moregalii, Cowi Bazar,
Bellary,

Be]]ary–O 1 . . . Respon;i.e_1_i: ‘ V’ ” ~ H

.—

II

This Writ Petition is filed under.Artie1e$;_ 22f26.;8.2 22’1_?’.Of’the’.
Coxlstitutioxl of India praying to set 8lSi€i£i’_”tht: impttgixed icxflezc’
on I.A.No.VIE in 0.s.No.242/04′ on tb.e’–~fi1e of _»th’e. :.came,c1’=_
Pri. Civil Judge and JMFC (Jr. D11.),- ..__Be]1a13r_ dated s.3.’8..;2QQ7 Vide _ F

A1111e.xm,’e~A.

This Writ e£.~.miing’;o1′:i’ p;’=§2hm.°f 111′ any hearm g in
‘B’ group this flay;Cot:17§.piaée*-.the’fQ1}9Wing :

~~~~
By Eirder dated 3.3.2007 vide

Azmexme-‘A’ 2 ‘fiie learned Pr}.Civ’:1 Judge &

V”in….O;’S.Ne.242/2004, the Court below

Vhhas; dismissed. tl1e application filed by the petitioners-

defe’n.dant§s’ Order 6 Rule 1? of 0.13.0. for aznending

v% T “–« . ‘_ . 2 Wiittefi statement.

” ‘}.;he amendment sought for is fermal in nature.

typographical mistakes are seught ts) be rectifieé

V’ the identity of the prope i \sought to clarified. The

-3-

suit is still at the pI’€limiI”1flI’_’§f stage. Since the amendfiiénfi

sought for (1065 not take away the admissions if _
by the defendants in the written staten1ent;—Tiiiei u
below ought to have aliewed the:=.,1appfié¢afiQf1~. fi1édif-Lf9I*A ; A’

amendment. By the said vf V p:iéj’:1;i.iQe _for%

izzjustice would be caused to ivnln fiiriew of

the same, the following is
The datéd Vida Annexure-

‘A’ passed:’%b§%’ ‘g:udge & .}.M.F.c.,

Bellary, on} ~ G.s.No.242/2004, stands

quashed, . I fi.l?3,d ‘b3?é”{he mt’1l:ioners~dei?endants is

H fii€t’fiiQriA’TiS’ aIIowed accordingly.

Sd/-

Iudt:-I6