Smt Ramzanbi vs Jothani Hiranand Lalachand on 17 June, 2009

{N 'F}ii%} HIGH QEQURT OF' KARNATAKA

{i:EF£C1E,J§"i' E3EENC§~§ AT GULBARGA  H

£'}A'i'EI} TH£S THE: 17% mm' or: J:3N2;',:----2Cr§f§§"'   ~

E3E3FC}R:.E§... 

'TH 5: HON'BLE MR.\}ti'3?1a;3k. i3.S,;.PA"{Q   T' " '

MiSC?EZL1,AN I:§{)i..ES 1>'IR$r';§P:-i~>EAL"'Nv::>'] 607$: '  vizijegi (WC). V: *

E3 BTW E5'. N :

E. Iéfamzxanhi Wig Mahvirfifrlbséb ;     
Chapparband, aged about    '
Occ: FIous€%1<}}1 y§:_a1*s, Nil _'

 Aghpélg 8,50  'C-happarhand,
Aged abolgtt 4 years,_ £33522": Ni}

4. viviphiiia S/c3V.M'ahif:)9c3Tb Sab Chapparband,

 'V }Eg€<i72  Occ: Ni}

   2 to 4 are minors

H - Tliey azfé,-_répfeseI1t6d by their I.}.8t1H'a}

A .:;::ot.h§:r A;;q}e}1a11t No. 1.

!§1l":3;;"éi- R] 0 Near Hamal Colony,

V' * :Yg:)ga'1E:11r, Bijapur District.

 Appellants

(By Sri. Shivashankazg' R. Manur, Adve:3wca£c)

AND;

1.

-Jothani fiiranand La}a(?ha:1d
Aged: M2301′, (393: Business,
Riv 307, MR} Cliambers,
WaTa<:d€:wa{ii} P1lI1f1~41'1 O08.

{{}w13.€r of the Taziker Reg. Na.

MH- 12–F’A–98T”O}

2. The Oxientai In$u3’anCe C10. LH§.,
Putze
Summons to be sezvsd through
The Branch Manager,
(}1’£t3n,t,a1 lnsuraxlce CEO. Ltzi,
Bijapur.

1 . V 3 A. §2e’spc§;fiiIeIVits
(By Sri. Sanjay M. Joshi, foi’ ~R-VVi2:,–V’:11:’1*:i(:e: to R4 is
dispensed With}

This M.F’.A. is fxlecffvmdctr S¢{?ii{5I1: 3*3′ {1} of WC. Act against
the judgment SIR} award d’ated’V”i?f}’.{}_2., fpasssd in WCA/ SR]
11/21306 on the f£}.f: “{)§ .3116: ._”~,C0m_mii¢;;s%’i0ne:’ of Workmens
C3ompensation,;Bijpés,ur.

” ‘for orders this day, tbs Court
aiehvered fQlI0’a2itx–g:’- _ V ”

VJBDGMENT

” V’ . A :a’p.{}€al i;s Bj§ tnhe c.1aim.a111:s aggrieveé by the quanmm of

fgwaxded by the Wc=rkmen’s Cnmpcnsafion

Caiigtilissiflziti-:’,’ :Bijapu1′.

hes clajmantsrappellants are the dependants 0:? decaased

Sab Chapparbarifi. Tfie de«;:eas;€:(i was working as a

VM dfivcir. in an actcificnt thai, amuse Out of during the course: of

€:mpIc>y’1:x1€:11t.0n 18.05.2805 116* s~3z,1<t:<:1m::he(i to the stations» i:13't1.ries

suffemcl wlfziie he was §;sr<:K:t:<:t:iiI1g from Mangalom to Bijapur on

National Highway»€s3. His Wife and flute minor childn:-:11 moved

in

the Clommissziontzr sacking compeusaticm Ccntending' :..1×1".};'§{f.i"i'iVé1i_{:I that

the deceased was earnizzg Rs' 5,900/– per mom}: 3

driver of the heavy gaods vehicle. EI1t_.'$1i§T)'%I'E'.

claimant. (first appeilant Smt. J

to 953 wen': prcrducfid anti _ '?11€'Ca"7V'I1~;"I' of thtrfigh
served with notice remained ab$_éi1-£:_a4*1§i Wéfi '–};:l};1ce(1 ?cxpa1*te, The
resp0nd:::1t~i:nS1u'az1Ce V<:<fiifi;pa1§;jy* __»::h0sc ta laad any

€\IiC1f:§3C€. _

3;’ “B’a:~’.r:§§; <3:i §1:t}2€""%:$}ide:1éé'""-ziin recoré, {hit Commissioner
having fectirglecl the accidcnt arouse out cf dmiing

the course £rLf..§:23::p1o}émc;i't'«1;ré1s taken the: monthly wages 63111661 by

"fight: v_»»&i:;ce§5i'sf:p1 a €' 'f=1's__. ____ 3,000/~ based on the notification dated

13\{$i";£.f§(iI1g the Ininixnnm wages of dI'§VE:I'S employed in

has awarded compensatfirm on that basis.

Q; L;3a;rI2€d Csunsel for the app:-3114311! contends that the

‘ Léi;}Ap;r”L5fi>”;’::«:_.<:rh adopted by the tribunal in ignefing the evicimxce an

rf:{:§OI'd anti in basizag its conchlsion on the mixzijnum Wages as

u §oi::£flc:mpaz1y co1:ti:ex;dS that the minimufla wages