EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN
DATED THIS THE 13:' DAY OF 1)ECEMBER;2{--)«'1§)..,'._: ~ %
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE
WRIT PETITION NO. 38965.. op' V2009 [G11/:I'¥'i?.;ES)VV' :3
BE'I'WEEN * J '
Smt. Rangamma
Aged about 64 years, _ Q
W/0. Late Chikkagangaié{h',- . .
R/at No.295, 2"3'f;2x1§oss;=._ :
" .
Masjid Block, j j »
"
Bangalcg-rem 563-O.,O214V _ -- Petitioner
(By )
AND »
_ Bank
-.Bas._avan.a;g--L1di Branch,
B*a;nga1o:e.:~:~ 560 004
"Represented by the
""4.Bra_.f1'ch«-'Manager
" " .. , _ s;?:;~---C. Nagarajaiah.
_ "S/0. Late C. Chinnappa
Aged about 57 years,
Prop: M/S. Vishnu Gas L.P.G.,
Chowdasandra Village,
Honnasandra Post,
Nelamangaia Taluk,
Bangalore Rural District
3. Srnt. G.N. Geetha,
W/o. Late Govindaiah,
Aged about 65 years,
Residing at No.952/ 27,
3" Main, 3" Cross,
Vijayanagar, V A - = --~
Bangalore --« 560 040 Respondents'
(By Sl’i.V. Haridas Bhat, Adv. foi?V’:i”»2._3.}’».
This Writ Petition “issiiled under gkijtieles 226 & 227
of the Constitution Of India._pifayi11g=.tov(;_u_a’sh the paper
publication issu_ed_ byqthe ».fesp.onde:t1t…p’no. 1 in Hindu
Daily English’ ‘ Ne’w5f;>aper”” dated’ 12.2009 Vide
Annexure — __L; ‘I. ” X _ .. J .
n ..*…. ..’-
This on for pre1imin’ ary
hearingkin’ ‘B’ C§ro1._ip..Vt13.is”* day, the Court made the
fo11ow”ing:”__ 4′ _ W
‘ herein is irnpugning Communication
datedhl at Annexure W L, published. Hindu
‘es.,.,.,_.44″I3’,ng1is1: newspaper and letter dated 26.08.2009
“:a_dd:1?e’ssed to the petitioner vide Annexure — D.
“V-‘\
and outstanding from the second respondent as on
10.12.2009. In the said letter it is stated that, ifjthe
amount is not paid the bank will be taking
steps for attaching the said property”fQr”~,reali_Asati0¥1″of
the aforesaid dues. Similarly, ,,1etter4’at:;*\_r1nexirreA’+- it
communication sent to the petitionervhherein to
her notice that isusudhject to
mortgage rights of of loan
transaction, V
5. two ietters being
_o’g’r”Vdt1asi1ing them does not
arise. In these what is sought to be
conVejfed,.to p_etitior’:er herein is that amounts that is
respondent to 1*” respondent and the
resportdent. to recover the same on the
.security the property purchased by her. Therefore,
qiiestion of quashing the said communications does
arise for consideration in this Writ Petition. Hence,
”»_the same is dismissed.
wvx
UK
6. However, liberty is reserved to the ..
and when notice is issued to attach and se«’l,1_” the M
property, to approach the competent aut5E1:0»sfit._fi{V”:VioVL.”‘.
substantiate her right against the ‘at’:t’21e};1I11ej;1;_tp/V
the property.
JJ