Smt Rudramma vs R Parvathamma on 26 June, 2008

 BANGALO__RE~<-- 550 

11¢ 'rm men 0003'!' or xARnA'rAKA A': 3AnGA1go;f_i LE7  

DATED Tms rm 26" ms: or Jam f   3A; A

'rm nevus um. ms-rxcm (LR.   AT' A

BE'I"W%fl :

SMT. RUDRAMMA

W/O LATE B. BASAVAIAH , A

MAJOR, RESIDENT OFVN0. 43__f  ._    -

7m MAIN ROAD, ?ADAYANAl?URA" _  V_ 
BANGALORE»-~56O  A .    "  

       APPELLANT
(BY SR1: PRAMILA .A3esOcIATF;s/OGEETHA MENON
-     

ARI):

R. PARVATHAMMA A
w/O C. REIIJRAIAH A
MAJOR, N(‘}..43 (?OR’FIGN} &&&& 1’ »
VWMMN ROE?)
PADARAYANAPURA A

A RESPONDENT
IV’I’HIS ‘ EPA… 13 FILED UNDER SECTION. 96 READ WITH

4 RULE 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DI’: 17.03.2006 ?ASSED IN O.S.NO. 4241/96 ON
OF THE XXII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE,

V’ DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR INJUNCTION.

A’ fiils REGULAR FIRST Ai3PEAL COMING ON FOR

-.O.VTLO«-:03-IDERS BEFORE THE COURT THIS DAY, THE COURT
MADE THE FOLLOWIN’G:~

(/

nmmm FIRST

ORBER

Learned counssl for the appeilant is absent.

have not been taken. Hence, this Regular F’n’st

dismissed for default. A

*rk.