1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 25"' DAY OF NOVEMBER 2010
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. EUSTICE c.R. KUMARASWAM'{""T A
BETWEEN:
SMT SAPNA
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
W/O BABU
R/A NO.241, 15* BLOCK
RAJENDRA NAGAR
KORAMANGALA V A * ' '
BANGALORE -- 560 047. p Y. .".~--..EET1'Tt_ONER
(BY SR1: BASAVARAJA PATELO v'K,Y.AD\jO§:AT'E.vEORjv ..
M/S: GRATIA LAW_cHAMBER.=;,RADVOCATES), =
1. STATE OEVKARNATA;<A 4 .
BY BASAVTANAGODI v.:O--.Y;EN._PO:,:cE STATION
REP BY ITS-PUBLIC PROS_E£uTOR,_
BANGALORE.'-, - .
2. SR: BABU _
, AGEDABOUT 35 YEARS__
'S/O SMT SARAEA
R/A'N,O.241,.;5T BLOCK
*RA3'ENDRA*NAGAR, *
KO.RAMANc;AEA
BANGALORE
-SMT SARAL-A
'AGED ABQUT1? 50 YEARS
H A A W/ODATE RAJU
E.RANT-D/O SARALA
'~~AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
A fix'/I
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5506 OF 20_1~G»..').:":~., TORI
5. JASSI D/O SARALA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
6. ROOPA D/O SARALA
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
7. REENA D/O SARALA
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 3 TO 7 ARE
R/AT No.22, 20″‘ BLOCK –
B w s BLOCK, KORAMANGALA A
BANGALORE — 47. “~…RE’SP€jND’5N”i’§.
(BY SRI: B RAIA SUBRAHMANYA BHAPT’,..HIGHVt:DUP”€ .
GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESP.ONDENT !\iO__.1)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED DNDERSECTION 4’82,_OF_CODE
OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO’ OLTVASH THE ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME NO.232I2.C09′._RE-::5IsTERED’=Bv THE FIRST
RESPONDENT POLICE AGAINST RESP._o’i\1DENt;’NoS;2*..TO» 7 FOR THE
OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION -ABBA OF”IND1’AN—- PENAL CODE,
PENDING BEFOREIIACMiYF,’BANGA:LORE-” A ‘ ‘
THIS CRIMINAL… i~.ErI%TfI”Oiv ~COMING ON FOR ADMISSION BEFORE
THE COURT THIS DAV’, TH.E.CCaL;RT MAjDLE”THi§, F0.i.LOWING:-
The petitioner Counsel are present.
Re.Spondent’:’No~.2 isV”a!_s:ov present before the Court. Joint
afiid_a\Iit=of De-tAitioan’er__ and respondent No.2 is filed, which
reads as Dnde’r;’
“‘\a’\.Jv’g_:-é’3~, Smt.Sapna W/o.Babu, aged about 30,
No.241, 13’ Block, Rajendranagar,
~ Kofanaangala, Bangalore»-47, and Sri Babs;
-S;-‘}o.SaraEa, aged about 35, R/a No.24; 1″ Biock,
A/’
Rajendranagar, Koramangaia, Bangaiore–47, do
hereby solemniy affirm and state on oath as
follows.
1. We state that we are the 15′ petitioner and C’
the 2″” respondent respectfuliy in the *’
petition. We are conversant with the facts…a:nd”‘«C.V”
circumstances of the above petition. ‘”Henrce-;’we’ « ‘
are deposing here under.
2. We state that we are”CVlega!|yawedded”,:a’ri~rj’~—
the marriage between us wa3.._’%so_|emn’i-zeid'”on;
6.1.1999 at E.W.S2iq..1__i’artedr’s’,” ppi<;sra4mangaia;
Bangalore. _ . . V _
3. We state that ou:r”rnafriageiwtas; performed
in accordance i}j{wi.ii1’dLiv”Reitg’i”ous’ rivtes’ and we had
two chii_Jdren_’ tojV:us__oIJ_t _otwour wed iock,
4. IVSapnaV statVe:jt%hatV_:CI*-have filed a complaint
against the__ hrespo_ndeht:_”..’i’No.2 and his famiiy
menfii-§’)e’rs. befo’te._V_VVtVhe Adugodi Poiice Station in
‘VCiTiV{t”‘i”{°.V. N”o.2′.’}.2,_/2O()VEV9u””‘i’or the offence punishabie
of the Indian Penal Code in
crim~e’No;2’32’rof’2oo9 which is pending before the
Court of 32″” Additional Chief Metropoiitan
K”f”Magistrate, Bangaiore.
Q/,
In the circumstances, we have decided to
put an end to all the cases on the following
conditions:
5. I Sapha herein further state that I have no
objection in this Court quashing Crime No.232 A
2009 which is pending before the 2″” Additional,~,:’*-ll”
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore.
6. I state that since the complaint were uiodged 4′ ‘
due to temperamental differ_ehce*..a’n-d irnpl’.ied” C’
imputations we have no objecti’o_n to.” duasgh
entire proceedings. _ _ _ _ _V
Therefore, we S.rnji=.Sa’pna.,l”VJ[o..,’Babu and
Sri.Babu S/o.Sarala respecttuily’
Court may be v’p’etition as
prayed for i_n…the of _j..ust;ice..” ,
2. Thevzdispute husband and wife and
they have settled”-.th’e.rriatt-er’.’*~*”llV In order to encourage the
setti’e.merii:j’aarriyed at between the husband and wife and also
as of the joint affidavit that the wife has
objection the Crime, in my view, this petition
-..l.de$e’ryes to beiallowed.
v~:l_3rVI;n’~the result, I pass the following:
€/’
QRDER
This Criminal Petition is allowed in terms of the jointijfe
affidavit filed by the petitioner and respondent
Consequently, Crime No.232/2009 of Basavanagudi…\itio»m’en::
Police Station pending on the file of H Acldl.
is hereby quashed.
f.1S§GE_f
KM