High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Smt. Seema Khalko And Another vs Union Of India on 4 November, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Smt. Seema Khalko And Another vs Union Of India on 4 November, 2009
FAO No. 1804 of 2009                                                             1



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                    CHANDIGARH
                                       --

                                FAO No. 1804 of 2009 (O&M)
                                Date of decision: November 04, 2009


Smt. Seema Khalko and another                          ........ Appellants

            Versus

Union of India                                            .......Respondent(s)


Coram:      Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
                     -.-

Present:    Mr. Namit Sharma, Advocate
            for the appellants

            Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocate
            for the respondent
                   -.-

      1.    Whether Reporters of local papers may be
            allowed to see the judgement?

      2.    To be referred to the Reporter or not?

      3.    Whether the judgement should be reported in
            the Digest?

Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)

The only prayer made in the present appeal is that the amount of

compensation awarded by the Tribunal, which was ordered to be deposited in

some Nationalised Bank in the favour of the claimant, in the shape of Fixed

Deposit Receipts, be disbursed to her forthwith.

It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellants that

appellant No. 1 is adult and is capable of using the amount of compensation

in accordance with her own need and requirements.
FAO No. 1804 of 2009 2

Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection in releasing

the amount of compensation in favour of the appellant No. 1, who is a major.

In view of the above, the instant appeal is allowed and the order

dated 27.02.2008 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench,

Chandigarh is modified to the extent that the amount of compensation so

awarded shall be released in favour of appellant No. 1 immediately, who is the

legal heir of the deceased.

(Nirmaljit Kaur)
Judge
November 04, 2009
mohan