Smt Sheela @ Sheela Suresh vs Sri K C Panchalaya @ Prem Kumar on 19 December, 2008

 %   czmas, M;R.S.Palya

«  "Beam! 'F0Wn"
"   G46  Respondent

IN THE HIGH mum' ms' KARNATAKA AT   u 
DATED THIS THE 19%' DAY OF  
THE HON'BLE r«4;R..1us*1f;A%4§f:E:1g;--,:§§,esr.}1AreV1A~:A!; % 

REVIEW P§I"i'I;i'JN
   *

9;’. RL. R.I?.V!-‘!a.2_392[_

BETWEEN:

ShccLa@ Shccla”:”3uré?’s,h.

W/G Sumsh ' "    - 

43 yrs, r/(3 NOA4 " .1"    "

Nandidurga'     

Benson M , .  " 

Bangalcrrc-46 "     Pctifioner

 1   Roddy, Adv.)

"Stun-av-vim'

51 rjo No.13?

(By Sn’ Vcnkatcsh R Bhagat, Adv)

connection of judgment which came to be
the question of again reviewing ii-Z3’i!.” V’ ‘
arise. Even otherwise, there is fig
error cmpt in the order
apparent on the fact: qf the dated
m«oa-2007. In View amt in cast: of STATE
REP. BY D.s.P.a.B.c.{.B;,i.c;;;¢§az;fai_ izajcadran &. om
(2003 AIR 1 the pmvcr under
Smfion 4é2_(;?.§§ to re-0pc:1 or alter
the Hence, rcvicw petition is

dismisseg ‘as. Ixiit:

. ._ sd/…_
_____ judge