IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 21" my or OCTOBER, 2010 T
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINcHrI,¢_jEnI1.A_2.j:~ "
WRIT PETITION No.i9284/2020 ('i_4B"f.EuL.E).2_' " I A
BETWEEN: A M 2'
Smt. Sheshamma,
W/0 late Muddahanumaiah,
Aged about 65 years, '
R/at Kaiya Viilage and Post, I _
MagacliTaEuk, Ramanagar Distr_ict.r._ jg .. Petitioner
(By
AND:
1. Eiection C«ommiss'io.ner"rT
State of Ka.rna.taka " '
Cunningum Road '
Bangalore ' '
" 'D.e'put.y: "'Co_njrn.ission'erv-- ..... H *
V.yRayrr:anaga'ra District
R.arn3n'aga'ra'I _ Respondents
.’.’V’V{By’Sri R.Devdas, AGA for R-2,
.–..Sri-.K.N.Phanindra, Advocate for R~t)
‘ _ _ This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the
«V *.__Co__nSt’itutio’n of India praying to quash the government order
f’_«_’date_d295.2010 produced at Annexure~G issued by the
C’re_sp’ono€ent No.2 in respect of Kalya Grama Panchayath by not
ro.i_lowing the rotation for the post of Aclyaksha or Upadyaksha
‘-A fj andgetc.
This writ petition coming on for preiiminary hearing in ‘B’
group, this day, the Court made the foliowing:
QBBER
Sri R.Devdas, the learned Additional Governmenté..Adx?o-catea,_” _
has piaced on record the judgment, dated,28.9.;E010.Tpass.ed,V ‘*
the Division Bench of this Court
W.A.Nos.3096-97/10, wherein the’0V_$'”:..r_}..gleitJu’dge’s*ord.er,,,”dated
20.7.2010 overruiing the preiiminaprf’:-oiiaj-e_ctions~–regarding the
maintainability of the writ Vp’et,i”ti_ori_ The Division
Bench has not ai3Drov-ed of~”ti’.e that the
challenge to the_ Adhyaksha and
Upadhyaksha”‘(jf C-}ri2m”~P,anchaya.ts”§is entertainabie in the
proceedings tender “Constitution of India.
2. Foilovyingdthie said ifiixrlision Bench judgment, this petition
i:s,.rejecte’dé:’ an the shortwglryound of maintainability, keeping ail
other. co.ntenti’ons dopein.
-V 3. ‘No order’ as to costs.
SCI]-
Judge
:’jMD