m Hm:-1 mum cm KARIMTAKA AT BANeA1.0r§:'z.T
mm-2.1:: ms TI-IE new my 05* human
BEFORE
1 EMT-'E3-HNANMA _ .
J'-"a¢';'=:E»'.'_'é.J5I.".'.'.*%'.I."'..T~"1"
"Wm flIfiK1*7M~flNIi?fiPP$:
R} m':
xmmmmfiafiuamma JALAHALLY
{BY E-'.1-IRE M :'fi,tji?.}
' --¢....m-'...-.
1- ' éTA":I.5'E'}V..OF KARNATAKA
»%..m'
}£a'H£3:fiLORE
531 M MLTNIYAPPA
E7' M9." '" TE Kr'i"i'E-i:'iLWF1LE'}';'fl:*u l'uiI:"€I$'§-'u'u';'-'J-'uu""P.'%
.fiGED ABEJUT 85 YRS
H3' f'L'}i'." NG..'?"?' MUNIYAPPA C MPCJUHD
1'-':'.%.!.F'I.JF.»'¥. CQEIJL PQSI'
E13116 ".?uflaI..£Z1RE 54
---'---uv-\- --n -u----u--1.-guy'-n nu-
3. $121: TE'HDLAEi&MMA
.fiGE»fl Exfi-WET 53 ':"R$
W)' at wmmm SI-I
WAT NCJn83f*'-1» 4TH amass
RILTIAD
1!uMHflLAE'ISI'fl'uII LAYOUT
zvimmmi
BANG-Al.(Z".i=RE as
«I. myflwagwua
$3-.GE-D ABOUT 7:: was
R*,;r':'?L'T' f:eaGaRf%%% -
MAIN ROAD V WARD
EJQIJDABALLAPTJR T
E.%l!¥!'_"-i.>'%.L*""'5""'
'1.-uI'J:\ul»J-'.
my aim: Heap FUR R1.
9"" 3*' -~?''-31%''?*'*"35%3*§:=% $13Vr%%F"3R% 331%?
£'.':*RL£;.U;S.454 cR.P.c PRAYIHG
TO Sm' A;.--'?$IDE I!3"T'.i3i7f:i00"?" mfisfira Bi'
JG-EII":3;_I?iIT;IL."' AND s..J., E'LORE IN
E&.~'2-.I\I§L'1V.211.,I'1'€#_E'J"Tr' k.a1m manor THE s..J. T0 RE"I'URN
nrr .1'Ifi-!t.'l.* 1:31-nr1:t c'|'I!:1"J"II'."l"'!. T!!! 131? aznxnn
h?.l.'a'J.uI:J.I.'J.I.»!' 1.1! II.' usrp rug
iv8:j9'I'";. "2U;""X? Efifgfi TH FAVGIJR {IF THE
% comm on 0 I-IEARING 1'1-11s
'I'I'.\ T'."uJ"\'l' 'I' I"'II\"l'fI"IT
k % wawamnan u.-11:. ruuuuwuu :-
QUDQMEET
. appml is dirmztad against the order passed by .
_ " trial Cmzrt 7m dismiasing thn applicratinn filed by the
1-3 351 _g__r_s__t'I__ n.'311n-r-
.1-an ---upwv---u
ux'r1ar.nm1t:a 'bah-ngixug tn one
'V f-'|I'_....___'__aI..'~;"....._.".' _. ...._ ..T...._......_..d. .-u
0111!: {my .u:- J] ub_Iesu.1L mum:
appellant as Well aa by com '
:2" Tim brief facts: tmamaaqr for the purposafiaf
dissmmatsl csf this case are to the efiact
1.
…….-_.–… …….. -_
mag: ‘
mmpiamt fiksci fig fII’flE= 3’Ifi g .,_;.-L j
Lalmlmmmma by am ” V’
prosmzutinrx. slxbmitxed tlma sud’
twm amused and mée ;_ ~fi ivas in
-In–s_’_ u .-w.——
$.£.1.I-15.21159? aw in :£’t1r1_e; 1 _:;.;1,,:1i ‘ ml
A’- _
my and fl’IIcrA”‘” um
named above
mare bevelled. a.gainst- them.
After the ci’iiEs1c_§;nir:s§g:aLi’ pf sessions case by the
“‘* ” –‘ #.2.2’u’!.’.3, a-.p*-,…….”‘”-**..L..*-2’3
_uni}’aPPaI
herein and Tulaaamnm and
.. L reapnrmlenm 3 and ‘Ir undar Section
Lh-3 (.11-…P,L!,_;., fig: of gold nrnamnnm
11 1- _1__1_ _. _ PHI. 1.u..A…_.
‘ .___””‘n¢iu;:u1:ngim no the above ma manna-:1
‘ L¥’L1dga mm. afl flew appliczatinns with ragard to the
c}ain1 ma-M by mach one: -91’ thenn and ultimately rejected
the applicatiarm of all but second raapondant
91.,»
“..
I*aI.Mu1’1iyappa. It was ordered that propertim 1.T’p'”m
eqP.£’..Na.5w9&1 and pmperties 1 to 4 [I”.F.I’i”o§..1.!§’;_’;:(‘;§’I’_’_J§fi.”
pg’-tagmfiim 1 to l8I_P.F.No.20_!97} and J
_.1’I A…
…1………_.._”. a…
H rnwr.-o
1′
gr.» ‘.1″€fi.21€:f%], W’r€: “‘”‘ifl
1…. . .. . «
l.l’:I’- I §l.l.l..l’ I.u.2tup=’u_uL-.25.» A
rcspu:v.v.rmicx1t hmrein who
appliczaant hrafnr-2 tlrm trial Cosmu-t’V. ‘ £55 is
call-sci in qucatirzn by 1’ » ‘ _
3… 1 haj.re: ;;1fz¢:a1€c:?A1VV’ Aar. Counnol
Shri M..T.Iia;mm’ ‘ _ fh.: %&;g%%A%app.;»11ant& and the learned
and .a1rsdR’-‘t::r1″”‘ r’1.’ ‘ , H”-
m919″‘mi§I1t. = n
» 55″}:-§”‘~1aubmieaion of the laarmd :E»r.fT.’.oumc:i
3.i11~i –wr in that the appellant basJ.1.1g’ the
‘ ‘adapiézgwi. cnf den-ceaaad Lalcshrnamxna is entitled
“ff: AA1’..1iv.:e..Q:r_.’__;1~11_ :11′ in also a will
. ‘if ” gfiiifi ail the fp;”fi*pm”‘wu”* m the
k A %%%%gppe1m herein: and thmfin-e, the 1:1-m1 Court could not
have dianflmcd the applicatiun filed by the appellant.
9:/«
V
\l
5-” Can the other hand, learned Counsel far the
5.=……r.*r-….. -§u5§,I-.r,=z1.rr.7’i;..__’l: that trial court
czmaaidsred the placred ‘I:’.1I3xf4in1′”& it arid 1″”
that the snacand mapondent is the heir *
Cilaasr-1’1 of E1’1It1’y-‘P: to that: 11 sohsmulg afh
Eumaaainn Act and as other
-u.
=-~=’~«+-m+iv=-.¢: thair $1:-.-am t11a_tL”~~..t…¢=i 4.1:
Emma |.1lFI..|l.l.I4a||:i|’l.l J i
cinughtex-as cs-if the
appfima11t:a h.ewix1g tn
mm» that m.-,g¢g;m of the
judga has
Lififiufia. ta.’ ,:. 47.34;-*«~+..%ae: by c.*.’z1….-=-‘-* ;.*.pp1……”*-“*-…;.
i11::1uufEi11g: *:.11’a and has passed the order’
in fammt rgaf
tltma ham-d both sides and upon a
xgflarfififli the ordczr -of the trial court, I find that
Igu …aJt§A.:.;.1.L1;4′:i;3e1l:z1r1t hEnreir1 is -zuxzlcerrwd, though the
é mm *==1-rm h¢f;:1-re t.1:z,e C.’:mn”f t….hwi:. 1511!;
‘W E1’? ‘Jul!-u|v’W’¢’JcJ. PIP’ –u– w’
nt in um” aciupfiefi. ti-f uacuaa'”‘”6éz’i
.’VL.aks1m1amrn:r1a. no matexrial was plaoeozil in support of the
maid mtanmfl. mlm-.r1 and the trial Caurt 1;1’1erafi:m,
lz
7
ft’
dhmimsad. the. rczlaim M tbs appellant. At the same time,
‘l;£:3 Etzzurt. fnund that the 36-«r*..nnti Ifiapundent
ii'”ifl’:ir1 ‘fhfi pm1rfi:1ex’v’ =17-f Suh Se*”ti”‘1 1 (if ‘muiax; 15 “f “”
Hindu fitacctaaaiann Act and he being the *
dmasmd Lakahrnanmm ‘a husbana, tn-.~.%
passearffi. an murder in flavour of film 7
.;.’a…1.J. ‘E.h.=a.1.: “ha applieant ‘E
the i*1e’ir oi’ xi-%’5″3”.§:_ f
MLmi§;appa.. In ‘rim ‘% before
the t1″*i»a.l C-u:n1:.1rt,§J!<rAi:;:;ri by the
lemmafl wank ma claim of the
a._1-,'.awl1*.*f.a-.23.-.'r'. t.ha.t Inf ea-'_*:n;I11r3.
raspznntmieznt.' – wail-aattieci law that rim
£Z:1*i111i::f;al t;2miir1t4V_:isVx1§:vtAtE1é"'"f:ro13er Fonun ta agitatna owr
' fl'.Lfi "" "£119. Under the said
the ljmited pxlrpnae of return1'.ns_:_ the
….,… £"…………'|! …….. ..
L1: .:u|.u uu '£1"u=
.__.._… _- ._._. .. .. 'I… -…
fl '1'. ' _"1i::.==.E1T.G1~' _ "".u 'W
aa11;tlm tima cut' her cieatlu. the Ciourt
ii-«fiaaaad the order that is uruier challenge.
it ia not the final adjudicration in am far as
T3,. In. vicw of the aubmiasion made by the learned
9.:’£«»rs£1m.3:nm:1 Ehri M.T.Nanm’a.}1 for the appellant that
._..-. 1 ‘
f3.*t=£)f’.aii1flE¥ rt: Iii
.:.fi. 3 E’x”:qi.1ea”‘ufifig har p””:’r-‘”f””” ‘
.. 13..
a- !.1.J’-.i_-13.
.5.
appe].fi.sfl1t,. in 111_’y’v1aw’ it is a matter w’hJx:h’ will ‘
adjucliuuabtad before ths proper Foru;r1Ai..e..¢,’ -fC’;»§i:ii;t”1_5z;
and T;.’:’:.a’e: C–‘rin1i11a.I Court camiot
a§l;~i11di’«gjj-i’mu 11¢ rv.-ivfl ‘n’h’I*
In I-V -Iul-Ga wad. 1-ow-um 0|-VII-lull
I ,
E’:–u-nu. in
3. In viaw of the ahfiigw though I :10
rant :5-17″” -“W-=*=-..*”-m *–f-,6-‘v.3-..tf..¢’1*– i..’|’..-e;..-“‘.%
with titw -t:~:v::’.»_.:*l4¢?=i’.:v 2 yet the
appa}.kaun§__ to approach the
aj§J§21’»2~g:a~ria§tas._ ..s’t.ei.ke hesr cl:-ztzim aver that
basing on the will
.”E-*w:’x~.”«’$ ‘Ifii1″=t’iTrE6I.’5’I.’.i.Ea’.’i\”3. 13:3′ ti” &”m=aa% in fawn: a
I”!
At the maxne time, in View of the
.m¢¢:mum;%put4mm by the appellant’s counsel, it is
‘ Icahn tn dimct the trial Court to abtam’
A 3-m’unHm’ mm t_h_¢:= ae:n;ss:_211c.1
71.. J
…………–..-I”, ..
.__””reta§1rr11r:.g’ fin-;~ pmpeerties to him. result, I “‘W *u1a”‘
V L’ f 4: . , : rardver: },
‘D
I O
Irzi
1!
.1’
Eji
:3}
Isaitulg any
qqflflfi jflavfllfifllflll ‘IR
.I- JIJI-ll-6’
Tm mial Ciaurt ahaii mite appropriétig
indemnity band frczm the amend
‘mf¢re tm p:”raper£§mI”i:-no’ hiI.’I 1. _ T
rfhllfii-‘ dimxnisa-£11 of the
1-vs-as-r am” ‘Ln .r;.;.-any V.l|.—-‘I’l&Vu.lK,
w gar um um nag)?’ 1..-uT:_!:?u 1
mmilabie m hflr” 5;; }.a.’s’&”‘i.r1 ,; to her
right mwr dweaaed
:{a£$1fi§B1’J1l’7l.fl3;; tlfi-:«::”‘L» V t1D!1E’ made