Smt Shobha vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 December, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 29"' DAY OF DECEMBER 
BEFORE é  
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE JAWAD RAHIM 
MISC.CRL.5627,/2AOIo_9'    "
CRIMINAL REVISION R»ETITIONINO.II54;t'2.O'O§  
BETWEEN: I '  I ' "   
SHRI KLRAYAPPA GOWDA,   
S/O J.S.LAXMAN GOWDA; _   '

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, _ . 2  
COFFEE PLANTER, KUMAE.ER_KVODO,...S? ' '

DEVADANA VILI-AG-E,  I    
CHICKMAOLUR TALL.5K.,&.DI TRICT' 
 ~  ~-  "  ' ..RETITIONER

(BY M/S. H D1HARE;_'CAO ;  & 
SRLB.H;'SHAMjANa7'¥-?3VS'.").T'-   "
AND: I I I  I I I

SRI.H.R.AI5PANvNAC__HAR STO RAMACHAR,
MAJOR IN AGE, I ' ' '

  RESIDENT OF AN'G!A._.D.I'VILLAGE,
'H.AN'THUR PO-ST, MUDIGERE TALUK,

 'CAHIC.:§N.A'OAVI..URT_ DISTRICT.

'IIRESPO-NDENT

 THIS[NISC.CRL. IS FILEO UNDER SECTION 389 OF

',_Cr.R.C.. 'RRAYING TO SUSPEND THE JUDGMENT OF
~.'-..v"C.OSNVICTION AND OF SENTENCE PASSED BY THE
v~f'..EAR.J\EED RRINICIRAL JMFC, MUDIOERE, CHICKMAGLUR

DISTRICT IN CC.NO.900/2004 DATED 29.09.2006 AND

 ALSO IN CRL.A.120/O6 ON THE FILE DISTRICT AND
 -SESSIONS IUDGE FAST TRACK COURT AT CHICKMAGLUR
 DATED 30-10-2009 PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE

REVISION PETITION RELEASE THE PEETITIONER ON BAIL.

THIS MISC.CRL. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

A



ORDER

Heard the iearned counsei for the petitionejr’wo_h_:th’e

application filed under Section 389 of Cr.P_.AC;;

suspension of sentence is sought.

2. Perused the grounds urge;dth:ere’iin.–ii’*-

3. Considering the urghyed “of: the 2′

appiication and other-..attend–ing’-. ‘c’i-rcumstaincesg, I am
satisfied that the petitio’ne_r a case. Hence,
the order regarding se’ii’te’nc:e pegged ‘-in,t;.c.No.9oo/2004
dated 29-Q.9>2o_oE3.—‘ie_y” ‘i?_ris:’cip_aigV_Civii Judge (Jr.Dn) &
JMFC, and confirmed by the

Presiding ‘*aQfficer,.tai?’ast:K]Traci< Court, Chikmagaiur in

Cri.,.f\§::i\iVO'.~120/20OV6Vv_dated 30–10–2009, be and the same is

.Ahe«r.e_by_isu.spend__ed subject to the foiiowing conditions:

'%i;i–e"p'eVtitioner shaii deposit 25% of the amount

..__"co.\}"ered under the cheque within six weeks from

" ttoday; If he had aiready deposited any amount

V _ he is entitled to deduct the same to make it 25%;

— HA2) 3-fe shaii execute a bond before the triai court for
a sum of Rs.25,000/– with one surety for the
iikesum to the satisfaction of the triai court
undertaking to appear before this Court or triai

1/

court as may be directed in case of failure of this

petition.

4. Accordingly, the mac. CRL. No.s§$’2:7/2o’é’9T»’s”§

aélowed.

IUDGE