Smt Subhadrabai vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 August, 2009

-2-

IflififlifififiiCOURT(H?KARNATAKA
CXRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARG-A

DATEQ Tms THE) 17TH my <31? AUc3LIs'1;..;2i3p§%3 ~ 

BEFORE

THE HC)N'BLE MRJUSTICE E§JAI§zi::Ni{)'HA'N  J 

WRIT PETITION N0.V3929/X158 (GM §r=aES;"   

BETWEEZN:

sssgxzrr S£§BHADRABAi  {_ _  2. .
W/('E GURUBASAPPA T£«:ms:AL:-_«f_,  ;

3315:) ABOUT 69 YEARS   i 

occ; HOUSEHQLD \§f()R§{';'K.i$£D" .  
AGR1cum'UR£«;; 521.0 B¥~.iA'§AMB'§%A'  .. 

TQ: BI-£AL1§I.; §)1STx.VB_[I'}AR   ij  ' ..PE'i'I"§'IONER

(BY SR_§__   
ANS:  A' %' V '

1.

THE SAR, ‘1″Q;.–3%3;;::D;s*r. BEBAR

3″ 49i*;e:m:xi§i§U’1*Y DIRECTOR OF

A&NiMéi{;”[1USBflN§RY
E%’i’E)AR, ‘TQ 5.»; DIST. BIDAR.

1″-4;” ‘£92115: $868 E’I”ARY

___{E’eRz’xM PANCHAYAT

-4-

4. in the circmnstances, the c0nter1ti07;3;”‘r§f-«_Vt:’F1’e
petitioner as aired by her lcaarned ‘
unacceptable. Thfi delay being §:(}tf5’1’ciit2atc thcft” ‘giafiticn is

rejectecl.

._{:§

:a.,3§’gV;’ W

hm