High Court Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Smt.Sugna & Anr vs State on 23 July, 2009

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Smt.Sugna & Anr vs State on 23 July, 2009
                                                       1 of 2

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

                    AT J O D H P U R

                          :::

                         ORDER

                              In

   S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3461/2009

             Smt Sugna v. State of Rajasthan

                          :::

Date of Order: 23rd July, 2009

                          :::

                     P R E S E N T

     HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN

Mr R.K. Charan, for the petitioner

Mr Anees Bhurat, Public Prosecutor for the State

                          :::

By the Court:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as

well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the

relevant material/case diary made available to me

during the arguments of the case.

It is argued that the petitioner is a lady and

she is in judicial custody since 18th June, 2009 and

nothing is to be recovered or interrogated from her.

The co-accused Ramesh @ Rameshwar has already been

granted bail on 16th July, 2009 under sec.439, CrPC

by this Court in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application

No.3673/2009; therefore, accused-petitioner be also

released on bail.

After considering all the facts and

circumstances of the case and without expressing any
2 of 2

opinion on its merits and demerits, I think it just

and proper to release the accused-petitioner,

namely, Smt. Sugna w/o Chhagan Lal, presently

confined in Sub Jail, Nimbaheda on bail under

Section 439 Cr.P.C., in F.I.R. No.315/2009, Police

Station- Nimbaheda, District- Chittorgarh,

registered under Secs.419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471,

IPC, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand

only) together with one surety of the like amount to

the satisfaction of the trial court for her

appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as

and when called upon to do so.

This bail application is allowed accordingly.

(NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J.

mma