High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt.Sunitha.S W/O Late Shankar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Smt.Sunitha.S W/O Late Shankar vs The Deputy Commissioner on 26 November, 2009
Author: H N Das
LN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT  

DATED THIS THE 26"' DAY OF NOVEM.B.I|'?;_R;u2C1C94.A J4 A; "    

BEFORE   A 3 '

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE-.:fi";~LN. NAGA'B./{QvH)§N'TJAS
w.P.1\r¢;9677{.2oc§(:D.E:RES) " A j

BETWEEN:

SMT.SUNlTHA.S..   
W/O LATE S£1AI'---1K,A'R ._._ . A _ _
AGED ABOUT 35_.Y;£3ARE. .  

R/O 5'="'c:EDs.s,'"-. . . 
MARIGOWDA LA.*:fo_UE   .
MANDYA C1"[_'Y--57T      

 -   K1  ..PET1'l'IONER
(By sri.CHANDRA1<.wfrH--.R[G0ULAY, ADV.)

 V    A.   ..... .. V

 .1  jrH'E ICDMMISSIONER

MANDYA DI'_S'1"'R1.C'I',
MAr~..IDYA,. . _ 

Ki 1 "2 AA (:0E'I»d*AA'1"1_<)N OF THE (Ii'l'Y OE MANDYA
_ aj.Ex§:pEE:sEN'rJ3:13 BY ITS COM M'1'ss_1_NER
' . MAN"JYA1)'[S'I'RiC'I'

  MANDYA_ 571 401.

 (By SR1 RDEVDASS, AGA }?'0R RI )

RESPON DENTS

ma/A



-V.)

This writ petition filed under Azticies 226 8: 22fi7..Vtif_i_itin.Ve

Constitution of indie praying to direct. the resp<ure«Cdt.19.4.2007 and eic. 4' 

f per  _j i

This petition Coming on for prei_iniin.:i.ry¥ heiaring tii'iS"v-.§i:1';.g. .i

the court made the foiiowing;

In this writ petitionithe  writ. of
mandamus to consitier iier.iv.rgm?sentation.s C§€i[~fd
19.4.2007   Annexure-F and
25. 1   V     V iithese representations at
A1inexL1res&--C.,L ii  What is required to the

petitioner is not stated. '§'--T11e'~r"eqL1est in these representations is to

i "'s.et--as..ide the s1Iotment"'rnade in fiavour of one organisation anti for

A grant oii°..;'.ii}.iinCt'ioVI3..~~and the same cannot be granted. Therefore,

no 1n';iz.ic1:.;gintis«*'Can be issued against the :respondents on the basis

” -.oi”petitioner’s representations.

However, the petitioner is at iiberty to give a fresh

re.presentaLic.m requesting, the respondeiits with specii’i’.c detaiis

0′ W

Q”

.¢J

seekiiig neCessai’_v (LiOC1ji11(-311tS fmrii them. {f’sLic§’i a i'(J§_3i'(3SL’i”1[8U(_)1’1

is given, then the respondents shaii miisider the same: in

accorciarzce with law.

Witii the above (‘)bS€i”\-‘atiO¥1, this writ ;3etiticm~i:;._j§:.¢;fg§§,y”

disposed of.

Learned Addl. Goverziinent :\dx3<oca:éi is; pC~r_17s2'it_te"§

me-rmo of l}pp€.3I8§'1C€ within threé

E) K 8