High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Surekha W/O Sri Vithal Rao … vs Gulbarga Electricity Supply … on 12 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt Surekha W/O Sri Vithal Rao … vs Gulbarga Electricity Supply … on 12 March, 2008
Author: N.K.Patil
IN mm HIGH cotmr or xanmmm, 
mmn ms TI-IE 12" ms: or   

TEE P.'.'.u-""4'.%LEs' HR. a.'FJi%'£".".CE' ~ ""-'.K'."'V'~"'7'--I£,j H

 gfi-rri-;_"orr rix,<;_,%1a.i£:§";'2%a's  
nnmm     

1 am 3U'REHl?a__W.lO 5311;: no Txnmm
as stinks. a'vw1'-~iu"r:'%:M.k'a,~ a;'a*sV71i3i'i2.-'1
naLmmman,%k% New 
Guwfififia pz;.s'r.'=, _  %  =

2 "J1&'A".!Jfi€l!!F;A'Rj  "

   

41   nahmo. 6! N08 71/3/G/2/1
  alum: ROAD

 eumn:&Qa« '1::c%s1:,A% =   % . .. pm-zvrxmuns
M. ....g cmwaraawrna; .-*.:2=.='.;

"*3 x

 ksu'rz+a»nnGA%"Et.mcwn1c1r! swan! cmcumr

 -- %:%i%%j%.:;c:a';2L,:%1%.t:;:': sun nxugxox



unnhuannqnnn an 31-21 _
 -.5-'5-.I".'-°"n'-HWUIVI-Ill-I DI IIDDJ-D¢In'l'I-IN}

 Z  Jmamnna mac). . . . msrmmmr

{BY 3111 N K GUPTA; ADV.)

'H'I'.1"I"fl IEDTVF 'flI!'l""l'|'f'|'I"f\'Ll' TE I'Tf.l!fi "IIHIU l§'1'1'f"l'.'I!
an Gala-nlua. at a\- II-nun-I-vault

Gflég 'Ii IOHUV alt? H *fl$l IIQVHZ

i 226 mm 327 or ma: cons-In-tmmt or nmm

maxim To QUEER fl fiizfiifiiifififiiifiiifi fif.



GH ICOUIKT CI' KAISIHIIIAH Inlwujr.» ....

15.3.2301 Issues 2:: M. gngsnounmu-r% VIBE
mmxm. am: 5. 

-n-us IIRIT n1m'r:m~: 

mnxmmmt rmmxm ms mt, 

'i.".r'3'.n I-."3'."..'l'.a'.Ea%'."!'.7.-2

111.9 patitionifigjs-V..V_    tfiIV|}t'
corrictnaas   
No Marian: (Ti duéga  1s:%,s%;L2:?§1  _.'.aau-e.-'.'.. by :1».-
rospomdogt  B;   Gianni: :i.ng
:euponJau=.+:  ah:  of aa.12. coo!-
°°;1"°*§/gt' ya: 5:; ~  L J,   §'1:ha intrantnucturn

de-1.**Lel"=:'.!r'g:r.r.., ;V';1.*i."§VI"~%"  grouentinq tho inatant

V.  '1'ho W6':V:13_.' grievance man: out by the

*f'__fii»*u€i't;_x-:jxs2 is *.:.-*= 1;!-.1: gggpondent has called

"'7

 -Ffho pIi::'I.1':'i'i'1'ii:' ta pay a -.I1.1.._ at
 .. ,  n§".~i2, 0001- towczds the inixuifuufizfira

 -ilctrol-uputnarxt cost by tho respondent - company

‘fl’idO Annoxuros A I: 3 dated 19.3.2001

szeatszaéing that thn petitioners :29 than

/

%4n:z___….

/

Layout within the lifflifi 6f

corporation as only an 1980. so 4_

at trash davalopmont and

infrautnucturo will not *?.§.

gggggnagg that th§.:nqmafiu:_V_dd§é§findf aua%

for fonnuti-an ofi autninahli
and 1iab;a h9 haM§o§ gsiaprafi¢ £nanany sought
for ra:E11:’i’§_>!.V in a sum of
na.12.n§§}4Eg.He§¢§§ £51; Writ Petition.

3. ‘ _ the luxnnd counsel

tizhiiv petitioner and the caunul

, ‘&gV§gEé4:sning rospondont.

‘;1_ 7’££to:: careful evaluation of the

iiatigifil on roeond, it amzqod that the

” g.e+.~1«.-.1«.~.z-.-.-~; .1:-…:;-_.. -£ £i;L.i.g ohjggtion to the

hi’ filed ‘.7

“fit patition is 1191310 to he diamia:3’§&;”L:’–.T:”‘~,

Ageezéinglyi the writ “is

diifiiaaid reserving 11b¢:ey fig tfi§*piti§igns: .

to tile objection uri1;§:1n ‘ .i:_{ro uaé”::gfa. 4_v;:E:§:n’ %t:l§ia

data uf receipt of Jfiho Local

attics:/3ksaI1ataz;j:”‘:«– in tho

respondent ~– {:9 .1:gc_’.°g.:L_vg :h.

with c:om1ianco of tho
provided under tho Act
and RuIaag.§j efi§§§i£ioua1y as possible within

o.j£.ch1.’: “the date of receipt of the

A¢”@$j§~§tiap. ….. V4

than ahsorwationa, the writ

;;e!;iv:’i§:i: utnnda disposed at.

sal-

T *1′ Iudgé