aw THE HEGH COURT or: KARNATAKA AT aANGALQFe'é
mrsa THIS THE 24*" DAY OF FEBRUARY 299$ A' n V
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE D.V.SHYLEND.F%A i%K1;.sMA'jR
wm ;==E*rmoN No.47s5;29o9(cs~'pAs3 % - *
8 TVVEEN:
%
smr VKPONNAMMA
WIOKKKESHAVJW V
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS _ V
RIAT N0 1512, 3*" MAN. 5?" mass AA *
JUDICEAL LAYOUT t
BANGALORE.
K K AS'!-JAZK k'.LJ_MAR4' V
AGES €ABC3UT"3£'i----YE'ARS %
SEO KL K'VV!<;E8E-iAVA1S£" A '-
a{:AT":sso+V~j:-5:2,*'::3'*'° mam
5*" CROSS;.J€J_D!CfAL'LA'1'0UT
BANGALORE
K K i-{R':--SHvlKf§$.H**..V "
;5;o_K K KESHAVAP45
"'AGE'D ABOUTA3.2..YEARS
RiAT NO.$5"¥2, 33" MAIN
A » . 5"--7_VCROSS,__JUDlCiAL LAYOUT
smggaaaa
L' (av é;'R§.'i§i ?£}1;HV|WODEY/\R,ADV,)
%
V 'JOINT Rzetsrma
F'ETIT¥ONEF2$
RECOVERY CELL
KARNATAKA STATE URBAN GO-OF' BANK L78
NO 132, KM RON}, PB NO 2?24
BANGALORE-23?
0£Pu"s"Y RECHSTRAR
BANGALORE
3*' mm ROAD, 8?" caoss
MARGOSA ROAEL MALLESHWARAM
BANGALORE-63
ASS¥STANT F€EGiSTRAR A:-:m§E¢<j\:%§=az=zy = A '
OF-'FiCER (UNDER RULE 441)
KARNATAKA swcra URBAN BANK1'FVEDER,'AT.£§jN" V
NO 132, KI-! ROAD, PB NO._2C{24
BANGALORE-27
THE SALE OFF'!CE__R"'~.. f
ATTACHED TO RECf3VERYV'OFF£CEF§V _
SR! LAKSHMINARAYANA $o--jom3Ar~a}< we
Na 162'?l2,_PARK ROAD. I
RAMAMrsoHA;NPufiAM A x
8ANG_sAi;QRE;¢2.1 - % .
SR£__LA}<S:i*€?§'§.;i:.VNVi§F§_fic'{}5;Ni§:' BANK LTD
-NW0 1"52?S2§ Pffi-{K RQAED
f¥2AM_AMAGHA_NP§3'f%AM__ ~ '
a,AN@.AL0RE~.2L«aV_JJ __
1"}-iEx§*EPUT3"$b3ziM~:E§§SIONER OF Pouce
<.";:-"H35 €*E_COM£v'?l8SiONER OF POUCE
3EA:q'GVALORE« %%%%% .. .
é " ~ *'rVHE~%aN%s"PEc?oR
""{.E'S.i-j£WAN3'HPUR PGUCE smrsom
' ems:-:;.éu,RE
H"'S':'R§£\3.§VA8
$f§31'HUCHHAPPA
MAJOR
»_ «Two :4, VENAYAKA NELAYA
" :25 MAW ROAB
BANEWAPPA GARDEN
MUTYALANAGARE
BANGALORE-54
FEESPONDENTS
Authority and also by this Court an the eariier found of w:*it4£i;Vi'g ;:..;§'fti_{3.
it is not the case of the petitioners that they have paid__t;fie* M
nor they have made use of the opportunity that hac_§..b'V:£$g§.>:r; ..
is them in their eariier writ petit¥ons1;:AJt;:§9éj;tFri_§
NC'? 1536!200B disposed of on 9;!» ,20G9 t>'nA foiEo§.fvi's,':g
" The learned counse-I parfié$_$i3b§ér:it ff2'ai'V,W
the matter is pending. before--fffé-:'?égfsz'rar«'regarc?i}7g
auction safe noifcevanfi ff?e««_oefii:?$?z'efg9 ffénga appeared
and filed objections. $o§3h.§¢l'-appearing
far the fhfm' ti:eiA':.i¥:;j:£suef éggfimified fhaz';
the cc>:nc:fi£ri;§n«§}_'>;.f:3fe$$1__'¢rder_"gfahta<§m£$n 29.08.2008
has 9:}: c::§}2:p!£éc§7_'»2§iff3"V'anE;{ France, fire prayer
sggam :':if'.§i2i.§:3i;;2éstiffc;:j;";.s i;'é_£);@ z'o be dismissed as
hé--vi;:§_3'bcécéniéé-»i{éfi?:jé2£1¢'iis.' '
_ in %vie2wV gs' tAf:Ts3»'sI:i§mfss:22n made by the ieamed
.. gcaunse: £5: t£:£rd respmdent the insfant wrif
sfands of reserving iiberty ft: the
" rsdress his grievance wfzerafn he has
{he ccrrectness of the auction
--- pf£)?.'逧?fig.S and aisa in resgwct of the higher bidder,
., _ if the petifioners are stiff interasfed ta save fhair
V' ' - --. preperfy, fbey are 3:' liberty £0 give a represernfmfion by
putting far??? {ms-£r ready and wiiimgrzess is pay #19
awara' amoam' wifh interest. /
' «..piaceid°ene__~the%r zconcE'£1ei"in 'iiorepeyirient of the borrowed amount to
the petitioners from occupation of the premises the subject eeetter
of sale. in which event petitioners will be put to
injury and that uniess, the respondents are restrain.e_<Vi"'e§/t as?i_i.'i:1Vi';eiiirr:~ H V'
order and the 2″” respondent is directeif iioidiegeese ea’
the main appeal, the petitioneis wiii be p:£1t__to’.gAreat herfdehip,
etc. -.. _
5. The appeais of the petitiene_r$’-.,iecth\ on nderite of the award
as weéi as on the merits efvii1.e”sele%V_preceeei_reies~re>re pending before
twe separate Appeiiate Authetiiiee. iéroceedinge and
the sale iaursueijti’fa”;eeevery”‘ieei’eErieeeeeiieted oniy because
petitioners die; eeeziitioriei interim order granted
by the ippesaaelirriegegu. iiiiiiem conduct and the kind of
respeneeVV”‘s§V1§o’wffi who are the borrowers of
emounftefrem4’fhe_’F-‘rivetekloéieerative Bank, no permission can be
V’ the ifieek eeieed’ joy them.
6; Eeen this Court while dieposing of the petitioners’ eeriier
exit ipétiiion, did observe that it is open to the petitioners to fuifii or
seiisfiy their Eiabifity to the Eank and seek for reiief and save their
properties if they were keen on that Petitioners have not bothered
CR’)
:0 take advantage of this observation but have oniy indulged in
iiitigating unnecessarily by ‘Fling ms etc’ and seeking for stayef the
execution proceedings without payment of the emeuntiw_SeV§e4fi’e2’ee.
the petitioners have net repaid the amount to the
the observation by the Court. there is ne’juet:ficai}ieiii_e’rjV fe ii
seek fer any relief before this Court zzfzprenfeoiiyinia.
Amms2emdm?ememmfi@w§w@eefiewm@eev’
the submission made. I do not jusiificefieneirarranting
interference by this Court ~§r_{‘j%a;he “;’2r®ees:_iinas new pending
before the Appeiiate “i it
Accordingéy;”‘t£1isA$s;rit fietiiéeri’ -i.s’dis:ei§sed’;
sd/~..
Judge