High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Varalakshmamma vs Sri Narayanaswamy on 9 April, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt Varalakshmamma vs Sri Narayanaswamy on 9 April, 2008
Author: H.G.Ramesh
IN THE HIGH mum OF KARNATAKA, BANGA1:OF<:E M

DATED THE ogm DAY OF' APRIL 2008 &L j    % 

BEFORE

THE i-IOWBLE MR. JUSTICE-'H; cs,   f AA  A

WRIT’ PETITION No 17036 014′ X

B BEN :

1 SMT. VARALAKSHMAMMA,
W/0. Sri Nanjundappa,_ . V ‘
Aged 38ymrs, __
R/0. Chandur Villagtit, V’
Gudibande Taiuk, . if
Koiar District; j_= I

12 SMT. ANA;SUfam1viTB.:iA,’–..jT–:–.._ ” ,
W/0. Sari «.

Aged 3s..y,3aj_5, , _{_
R/0 — I
Gudihandc ‘I’a}11k; V ‘
K016-.r I”L’Ii3trir.:t. ‘

3 SMT.–vMUNii.;4fi§-ENIAMMA,
WM. ‘Sri R838.” …..
‘ R/9.

Knndaftia iidbli,

Devanaix33liATaluk,
Ba-J:_1ga_3or¢ District.

% « .j’:;-v’4__ SMT.” MANGALA,
‘ W’,I.p. Sri Prakash,
” 26 years,
R/0. Yela-hanka,
Bangalore North Petiwrs

G. Krishna Mtmhy, Aavomm) 2

-2-

AND :

1 SR1. NIXRAYANASWAMY,
S/o. Munishamappa,
Aged 48 years,
R/<2 Chcnncnahalli Village,
Jala Hobii, Bangalore North

2 SR1 CHAi~iDRAPPA
S/0. Mumshamappa,

5 1 52
Ii'/o. Vflage, –_ .
Jala Hobli, Bangalore " ~

3 SM'"l'MANJUL.5§,' % _
W/o.Sri

Aged Mama'; -. «
R/0. » 4' t *

' 3 Rcspondcnus

(By Sri B. s. snashi R1
Sri Vadiraj far 'R3, Advocates)

% – _ ngiéwfiit 'filed under Article 225 & 227 ofthe
praying to quash the impumcd order
by the Civil Judge (Sr. D11.) and JMFG,
M 0. S. N9.i2'2'26/2006 with regard to valuation

fee vide Am':ex.E. and direct the trial court to

h valuation made by the Petitioners.

-3-

This Writ Petition is coming on for 0mem§ar$

the Ccurt: made. the following Order :
om:1E_g %

Needful in four weeks stands

dismissed.

cop?

‘i E”:

; a.,r::sri :?:§’§~;z-zrztatairt
‘.4 –‘eyjz. 2:.:~§1e»,Sf§{} (30!

ii” 2;’

9»)