EVE THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA, DATED THIS THE 1713 DAY 01+' .DEcEm1EERf2Qb9. mFoRE 1 A C C E' THE HON'BLE WRIT PETITION Na, 31,09 'zoos YASHODA H _ _ " W/0. KODAE.'\TDA_'«, ' ' AGE 25 YEARS ;j_ ' 'a cH1IG:A;1\I'UTAVE, NETAVE POST' V TEKAL HGBLI,' 'MTAI,_Ij'=R _ ' KOLAR IXST _ PETITIONER (BY SRTQ * EE5vT.J1T'EN'DRANATHA, ADV] ' ., STATE OF KARNATAKA - ' DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND ,~cH1;LD WELFARE, M S BUILDING BANGALORE --- 1. 2 " ETI-IE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE, KOLAR. 3 THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYATH. KOLAR. , Exi vj \. 4 THE CHILD WELFARE PLANNING OFFICER, MALUR, KOLAR DISTRICT. 5 R SUJATHA _ Wm. M NAGESH " AGE 26 YEARS » R/AT TORALAKKI VILLAGE R5--~1..E0Ui'~ID._AT'SL.No.2o VIDE ANN--F; AND .. THIS"TiE'1i1T1.oi~e.,:'Comma ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, coUafrArMADEj1TIE FOLLOWING: ORDER
;p_’-Iaearneeltttteourisel for the parties submit that in
t:i.r’e’ornstances}where identical questions arose
con.siti;,eration in the case of Smt.S.Manju1a –v– State
A of Kariiataka in W.P.No.9’760/2006, a learned Single
“J1jr£ige of this Court, by order (it. 15.2.2007 dismissed
the writ petition as not maintainablefreserving liberty to
the petitioner therein to have her grievance redressed
before the appropriate authority’ while keeping oppn gall
“\
the contentions and that similar such orderjbe-p’aossed
“3w
in the present petition too.
rejected as not maintaina]_o1e in the likejgtevrms; as in
2. Recording the subniissiory f;th–is’: is”—._
W.P.9760/2006 which reads. .’th1.1VVSZ it
In.
Therefore,=.§if£thout;,j_ any opinion
on the merits ofthe –“this~:’._’Wr’it Petition is
dismissed fl’_’rese_rvi;ng’ 1iberty– petitioner to
redi’es’s«._h-erV’_V dgvrie-Vaneeto before the appropriate
impugned selection
“”!,f1st._so farftasg it _re1ajr.es to 5th respondent found
Annexure–H. All the
contentions urged in the Writ Petition are left
:*o’pen.A_”
sd/~
IUDGE