Smt Yeshoda Nirmala Kumari vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2010

' I' '-.....v.BANGA£u.ORE_--56{3: Om.

  DIRECTOR.

I     COMMESSIONER,
I _'FUMKUR.

  THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL IN KARNATAKA,

I

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT 

Dated: This the 15' day of December   I A
BEFORE';     fT_ V  V _  
THE I--ION'BLE MR.JUST1CE2__V.J.AQA;\JN'2XFH}¥N.I A '  ICE 5

W.P.No.2539.';;2009"{S4121  ~ I .
BETWEEN:    

SMT YESHODA NIRMALA KUMAR_1;'~«-- 5
W/O LATE TA SUDNARA RAJU. "I - '
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, V  H
R/A NEAR DEVANUR CHURCH,  _
s s PURAM POST. TUMKUEE-372':--102."" _ . 
. .  ,.  'V I "   .;-{VVPETITIONER

(By Sri N  img

M/S M s ANAND '*m;& I

AND:
1. THE STA}_'{.'E GF KARNATAKA.
 B'{._

URBAN, DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
MUIJH s"1'0'Rz_ED'BCUEDINGS.
DR E. R AMBED.KAR'VEEDHI.

¢  'V vMUM.cAIEAL"ADMINISTRATION.
'--  V V 'TOWER, BANGALORE.

I CITYIVIUNICIPAL COUNCIL, TUMKUR CITY,

BANGALORE.

 



C.M.C, Tumkur to release the family pensioriHto..flhe'r..

and the said request was turned down  H

endorsement as per Annexure?L"'dat'ed 

Submission of the petitionerstco'unse1 .'is_'th_atn

Petitioner produ ced certaVin*»d:ocurne1;t_s '   that
she is the legally   Raju
and one such  :1is.--:#'thjev'»t__'§~Survivorship
Certificate.     did not
accept   'and has refused to

release   to  petitioner.

3. 2'>-._%HvaVin_g'regard to the above submission

 p:;1t7:.forvvard a"r1d.....after hearing learned Government

 '  respondents 1 and 2, I am of the View

th_e’Vidrsa:tter requires to be examined in detail by

the 3f§”;.respondent. The petitioner to place{certain

“ii doclttments to contend that she is legaiiy wedded by

the deceased Suclara Raju.

3′.

‘aforesaid dir.ect.io’r1-..

4. As this court cannot go into the A’
question of facts, the proper course for the: V’
would be to approach the 31:61′ “re’s«por.i.dervi’tfi’V?.Vith’alien}

necessary documents in support«of”1rier case. * . 2 V’ K

5. Accordingly, d’ Ito the
respondent to considerp representation of the
petitioner and after’. documents
of her case, the
authority order in accordance

with law ” Jrrionths from the
date of receipt of Consequently,

Afl11€fi4ré’3;£5 0ti1a$hed”.’*~v eeeee .. –

disposed of with the

sci}-

JUDGE