IN THE HIGH covm or xAm~IA*rA;m "
cmcurr amen AT ' F'
mmn mxs THE 215? ngfi $30439; " _
Im;,1§oRE <.
THE Horrsw MR. JU8Ti€l§'H.N. HA¢A.!'é.o£i§fi'nAs
cmmzm. msvzamn .si1a§'ri1fi:éjie .xo.152'1 1
BETWEEN: 'V
E.
Fa)
" END
Sm' ZEE§§IA'?;:jKAUSAR3 '
w 10 ,;rAm-:3 A.I~.£7AMAQ_ MURAD-- ; ADI
AGED'AI£3OUT 37"YEAF?S',. s
0cQ_VsERv1c1a,_VV - ~
I210 crs., mi) 38312 1<:'otr'v.IAL GALL:
BELGAIJM -- -
MAST-ERASIF: _ . _
S/0 JAVEI) MMAD MURAEDABADI
" _{AGE'.D Amuf: 17 vgmes
. " KU'MAR1~sHAR1KA
, ' " 1' £3,*0;1AvED_AHMAD MURAEABADI
A*I'.2%L's;o7."PAsSE1}V.,B:( THE II A1:>1:>L.sJ.,
BELGAUM IN cRL.A.No.1o9'/_m"'%.A§Jp coxmam THE ORDER
z:>'1'.s.4.2oo7 PASSED BY f1fiH g ..JM.F(:g11"""C¢uR1', BELGAUM IN
CRL.MISC.NO.2/0v74_. '
THIS P}s:%r1';5té:;;v ' 'CI()'1\'}iI.:l'3(} "(§N :§F(V)R ADMISSION, THIS
BAY, THE' ma FOLLGWING:
' R
vP§;tifi6n¢rs proceedings under the pmvisions of
lvoi W6'mcn fmm Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for
shu§J::"'.t12e'V'*1§;;~;é; C.Misc.2/07 before the II Court, JMFC,
Belgafiie... "51;:':ii:s CrI.Misc.2/07, petitioners flied I.A.No.1 for
foflqwijfig reliefs :
"i] The respondents or any body acting
on their behalf be restrained from interfering in the
exciusive possession of I floor of CTS No.38}?
Kotwal Gaili, Belgaum,
aw»
ii) The respondents or anybody acting*:.on:°’–. l V
their behalf be restrained from interfering
complainants, their workers from ‘l3epen:lte._
tap water oonnection from municipal’ rcorploratlon ‘V l l.
water pipeline in CTS l$&.1,§3812l,”*A_I§lot\val _ 2 3
Belgaum.
iifl) The ree_t}€>’n_den_te or actinglon
their behalf be restraineti ‘rr5ml’i”if;te;§£e§-gag’with the
complainants, their*” ” -w:o’rl<leI'.e_ an lelzecting
iron] steel the 'loft staircase
leading us' :9' :32. '
iv] -. No.1 be directed to
pronede latleaatll per month towards
monthlgfmainteiraanee"out of family shop bearing
,, No. l99"}"'"/V48 Ganapat Galllfi, Belgaum."
both the parties, the JMFC Court
l passed 3_n.u:dle;rlas under;
H x ‘T,”Aeting U/s 23 of Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act, 2005;
i} The respondents or anybody acting on
their behalf are hereby restrained from énterfering in
the exclusive possession of I Floor of CTS No.33 ‘ jj .
Kcstwal Galh, Be-lgaum.
ii] The respondents or 4′
their behalf are restrained from inttA§rf¢fi1_1fgwith’v;hé ~ * VV
complainants, their workc:rs’ fx’i;>:;1 taking
tap water cannection from
water pipeline in CTS N038 C%aEli,”‘VV
Beigaum.
iii} _ Ci’ aéhgrbody acting on
their bang: ngrgby }esaf”a*i7r;ed: “imm’;n£errermg with
the .ca2nplé£1né1nié;._;. ‘rtheir’ wofker;-3 from erecting
iron}{stec;f£– gntranée of the staircase
ieadmg. to 41 Fioo;-.o§C51’€~§«~I§¥E5;8w£2.
: ‘ ” i ) V Refgidndéliat No.1 is hereby directed to
;_jno11Vthly méiritenaace of Rs.2,000/~ to
. “eo;np1aina:}is~–. __ from 05.05200’? until further
‘ qr;«:em..?*-~»._ ”
3. ‘ by the order in Cr1.Misc.2/()7, respondent
before the II Add}. Sessions Judge at Belgaum
No.109]2007 and the same came to be disposed vide
datcfi 24.08.2007 setting aside the ortier of the Trial
‘
Court insofar as it relates to grant of interim .
Aggrieved by this order, the petitionergazve before’ ” ” 2
4. Heani arguments .on.__hotnV.g£tie
entire petition papers.
5. it is not in dis,p;;¥icV is the wife
and petifionem;”‘Nog4QV of late Javeed
Ahamad ” the brother of deceased
Javeed question that arises for
my whether the Lower Appellate
Court is éageide the order of the ‘I’ria1 Court
‘ finsofififas; relates” “fine grant of monthly maintenance.
respondent is the brother of Late Javeed
K/fgufiabadi, the husband. of 1°’ petitioner and father
gefieonem No. 2 and 3. Under Section :25 of Cr.P.C., the
__ “‘j«BrAo§:t1’ei*~i11~3aw is not liable to pay the maintenance. Further,
” not in dispute that the 15* petitioner is an LIC Agent and
also Worldng in the Offiee of Joint Diieotor of Karnataka Land
Anny Corporation Limited, Zonal Office, Bclgaum and
income. Therefore under the ci1x:umstanccs,.~«~~’:I:i_c.__iLd:&fé:r
Appellate Court is right in setting aside the .()f:.A’:l.’.’i1f’i: _A
Court insofar as it relates to grant of ‘– . V
7. It is not in dispute: ti3Ei{‘i”fT}CLf:r€ are fiénding V
betwaen the yarties in réspectibf’ 1u}iiaperfiE:éV’of {he famiiy
including business. éhsis’ ssjsisssgegiimest for the
petitioners to fiic invivthc suits pending
before appiifiifiiiate relief in mspect of
income business.
Iii’tié:’:’i3r”Vto the petitioners to workout their
cases that are pending between the parties,
this is iiemby rejected. Ordcmd accoxtlingly.
Sd/-s
Iudfif