High Court Kerala High Court

Snagha vs K.Binoy on 30 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Snagha vs K.Binoy on 30 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 465 of 2009()


1. SNAGHA, 9 YEARS, D/O.SANTHOSH
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. K.BINOY, S/O.BALAKRISHNAN, MUNDERI
                       ...       Respondent

2. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.G.GANAPPAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :30/11/2009

 O R D E R
                       M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
                      ---------------------------
                     M.A.C.A.NO.465 OF 2009
                     ------------------------------
             Dated this the 30th day of November, 2009

                             JUDGMENT

This is an appeal preferred against the award of the

Claims Tribunal, Kozhikode in OP(MV)No.1161/2004. The

claimant, a five year old minor, sustained injuries in a road

accident and the Tribunal has awarded him a compensation of

Rs.7,000/= and exonerated the insurance company from the

liability. The said award is challenged on the basis of

inadequacy of the quantum as well as exoneration of the

insurance company from the liability. So far as the liability of

the insurance company is concerned, it is submitted that it is a

package policy with conditions. In the light of the decisions

reported in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Hydrose (2008

(3) KLT 778) and in Mathew v. Shaji Mathew (2009 (3) KLT

813), the matter requires consideration. But, unfortunately,

conditions of the policy and even the full policy are not

produced before the Tribunal.

It is submitted that the claimant had sustained injuries in

:2:

the accident and innumerable number of documents have been

produced and there is an application to call for the records

to prove the injuries. But they were not considered at all and

therefore, grievance is that the Tribunal has not considered

the materials for arriving at a proper decision.

After hearing both sides, I am convinced that an

opportunity can be given. Therefore, the award under

challenge is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the

Tribunal with a direction to permit both the claimant as well

as the respondent to produce documentary and oral evidence

in respect of their respective contentions and then dispose of

the matter fixing the quantum as well as liability of the

insurance company. The parties are directed to appear before

the Tribunal on 28.12.2009.

Disposed of accordingly.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE

cl