High Court Kerala High Court

Snil vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 June, 2010

Kerala High Court
Snil vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 June, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3470 of 2010()


1. SNIL, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.SADANANDAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.MANOJ P.KUNJACHAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :10/06/2010

 O R D E R
                               K.HEMA, J
                          -----------------------
                       B.A No.3470 OF 2010
                      --------------------------------
               Dated this the 10th day of June 2010

                                 ORDER

This petition is for bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Sections 381, 406, 465

and 420 of IPC. According to prosecution, petitioner was working

as an employee in Federal Bank and he collected identity cards

and photographs of certain customers which were kept in the

bank and he used the same to obtain 243 SIM cards for the use in

mobile phone and thereby cheated the customers and committed

various offences.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that except that

the petitioner was having 243 mobile SIM cards, there is no other

allegations against him. It is also submitted that some free

mobile SIM cards are available and that may be the reason why

he was in possession of a huge number of SIM cards. He is in

custody for the past 23 days since 18/05/2010, the date on which

he was arrested.

4. This petition is opposed. Learned Public Prosecutor

submitted that investigation is still in progress. It has to be

ascertained why the petitioner was keeping in possession huge

number of SIM cards that too, by fraudulently obtaining the

identity cards and photographs of the customers which were in

B.A No.3470 OF 2010 2

the possession of the bank. It is even doubted whether he has

any connection with terrorists.

5. On hearing both sides I am not inclined to grant bail

to the petitioner at this stage.

Petition is dismissed.

K.HEMA
JUDGE

vdv