High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sohan Singh vs State Of Punjab & Another on 27 May, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sohan Singh vs State Of Punjab & Another on 27 May, 2009
Criminal Misc. No. M-11718 of 2009                 (1)


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
                           CHANDIGARH

                          Criminal Misc. No. M-11718 of 2009
                          Date of decision: May 27, 2009


Sohan Singh                                 -Petitioner

             Versus

State of Punjab & another                   -Respondents

Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta

Present: Mr. SS Rangi, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. HPS Ghuman, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.

Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral)

The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482

Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.40 dated 26-5-2007 under Sections

453/380/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Bhadson, District Patiala

(Annexure P-1 ) and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the

basis of compromise (Annexure P-2 ) arrived at between the parties.

Complainant/respondent No.2 is present in Court. He is duly

identified by his counsel. He has filed an affidavit, which is taken on record

as Mark ‘A’, wherein he admits the factum of compromise (Annexure P-2 )

arrived at between the parties. He states that he has no objection if the

present FIR is quashed.

Learned State counsel submits that the dispute being of private

nature, the State would not stand in the way of quashing of the FIR in case

there is a compromise.

Criminal Misc. No. M-11718 of 2009 (2)

The compromise is in the interest of the parties and after the

matter has been resolved by an amicable settlement, no useful purpose shall

be served with continuance of the criminal proceedings, which would be a

futile exercise.

In view of the above, the present FIR deserves to be quashed in

the light of the decision of Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh

and others Vs. State of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052.

Resultantly, the present petition is allowed, the FIR and

the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

[Rajan Gupta]
Judge
May 27, 2009.

‘ask’