High Court Kerala High Court

Solomon Henry vs State Of Kerala on 26 February, 2008

Kerala High Court
Solomon Henry vs State Of Kerala on 26 February, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 989 of 2008()


1. SOLOMON HENRY, AGED 32 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. JOSEPH, AGED 34 YEARS,
3. BIATRIZ, AGED 29,
4. SHAJI, AGED 29,
5. JEROME ABEL, AGED 35 YEARS,
6. PODIMON, AGED 35 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.  K.SHAJ

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :26/02/2008

 O R D E R
                             R.BASANT, J.

                          ----------------------

                           B.A.No.989 of 2008

                      ----------------------------------------

            Dated this  the  26th day of February 2008


                                 O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioners are accused 1

to 6. All of them are named in the F.I.R which was registered in

respect of an incident which took place on 4/2/2008 for offences

punishable inter alia under Section 452 read with 149 I.P.C.

2. The crux of the allegations is that the parties who are

in loggerheads were involved in an incident which took place in

the church earlier in that morning. The third accused and the

de facto complainant, both women, had an altercation. Because

of such animosity, all the accused persons allegedly trespassed

into the house of the de facto complainant and indulged in

wanton acts of mischief and violence. Crime has been

registered. Investigation is in progress. Petitioners apprehend

imminent arrest.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners prays, the

learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the said prayer and I

am satisfied in the facts and circumstances of this case that the

petitioners can be granted anticipatory bail subject to

appropriate terms and conditions.

B.A.No.989/08 2

3. In the result, this petition is allowed. Following

directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C in favour of the

petitioners.

i) Petitioners shall surrender before the learned

Magistrate having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 04/03/2008. They

shall be released on regular bail on condition that they execute

bonds for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand only) each

with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction

of the learned Magistrate.

ii) The petitioners shall make themselves available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m

and 3 p.m on 06/03/2008 and 07/03/2008. During this period,

the investigating officer shall be at liberty to interrogate the

petitioners in custody and take all necessary steps for the proper

conduct of the investigation in this crime. Thereafter the

petitioners shall so appear as and when directed by the

investigating officer in writing to do so.

(iii) If the petitioners do not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to

B.A.No.989/08 3

arrest the petitioners and deal with them in accordance with law,

as if these directions were not issued at all.

(iv) If they were arrested prior to 04/03/2008, they shall

be released from custody on their executing a bond for

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) without any

sureties, undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on

04/03/2008.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr

B.A.No.989/08 4

B.A.No.989/08 5

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007