Gujarat High Court High Court

Somabhai vs State on 27 April, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Somabhai vs State on 27 April, 2011
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&Nbsp;Mr.Justice P.P.Bhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/5067/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 5067 of 2011
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 670 of 2007
 

 


 

 
=================================================


 

SOMABHAI
GANESHBHAI - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=================================================
 
Appearance
: 
THROUGH
JAIL for Applicant(s) : 1, 
Mr.KARTIK PANDYA, ADDL PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE P.P.BHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 27/04/2011 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)

The
present application is filed through Jail seeking temporary bail for
60 days so as to arrange financial assistance to the family.

It
is set out in the application that the convict’s father is suffering
from paralysis and the convict has an 8 year old daughter. In
support of the application a certificate from the Panchayat is
enclosed.

2. RULE.

Mr.Kartik Pandya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives
service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. The
applicant- appellant- original accused has been convicted for the
offence punishable under section 302 of the IPC to suffer
imprisonment for life, with fine of Rs.5000/-, in default to further
undergo imprisonment for 2 years as awarded by the learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Vadodara in Sessions Case No.249 of 2005.

4. The learned
APP has invited attention of the Court to the Jail remarks. The
convict had enjoyed temporary bail from 8th to 20th
February 2011. The convict had also enjoyed first and second
furlough and parole for 30 days in 2007 for the purpose of filing
appeal in the High Court. Every time he had reported back in time.
The convict’s Jail conduct is reported to be good.

5. Taking into
consideration the contents of the application and the record of the
convict, the convict is ordered to be released on temporary
bail for a period of 30 (thirty) days from the date of his
release on his executing a personal bond of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five
thousand only) to the satisfaction of the Jail authorities.

6. The
applicant shall surrender himself to the Jail authorities on expiry
of the above temporary bail period. The application is allowed. Rule
is made absolute.

(RAVI
R. TRIPATHI, J.)

(P.P.

BHATT, J.)

karim

   

Top