IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
OP.No. 30535 of 2002(I)
1. SOMAKUMARI S., W/O. SUGATHAN,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. A.LATHEEFA BEEVI,
... Respondent
2. NAJMA LATHEEFA,
3. IRSHAD M.S.,
4. HILAL M.S.,
5. HASEENA M.S.,
6. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER,
7. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
8. SHANIL S., S/O. K.SUDHAKARAN,
For Petitioner :SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR
For Respondent :SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, P.F.
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
Dated :26/06/2009
O R D E R
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.
-------------------------------
O.P.NO.30535 OF 2002 (I)
-----------------------------------
Dated this the 26th day of June, 2009
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
parties have settled the disputes out of court and hence the writ
petition is not pressed. Disputing that submission, the learned
counsel for the 8th respondent submits that no settlement has
been arrived, and further, that respondent desires to file an
affidavit with respect to the movables in the factory. Since the
petition is not pressed, no further enquiry is called for in the
petition. It is open to the 8th respondent to file affidavit, if so
desired, before the curt below. Writ petition is dismissed as not
pressed.
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
JUDGE
prp
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.
——————————————————–
O.P.NO.30535 OF 2002 (I)
———————————————————
J U D G M E N T
———————————————————
26th June, 2009