Posted On by &filed under High Court, Kerala High Court.


Kerala High Court
Soman vs State Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 4445 of 2010()


1. SOMAN, S/O.DAMODARAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA.
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.RASHEED C.NOORANAD

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :04/08/2010

 O R D E R
                          V. RAMKUMAR, J.
                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
               Bail Application NO.4445 of 2010
                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                DATED: 4th day of August, 2010


                              O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner

who is the sole accused in Crime No.46/2010 of Nooranad Excise

Range for an offence punishable under Sec. 55(i) of the Abkari Act

for having been found in possession of 800 ml IMFL, seeks his

enlargement on bail. Petitioner was arrested on 9.7.2010.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the offences, the

duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner and the

other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to

the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be

released on bail with effect from 16.8.2010 on his executing a

bond for Rs. 35,000/- (Rupees thirty five thousand only) with two

solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

J.F.C.M Court-II, Mavelikkara and subject to the following

conditions: –

Bail Application NO.4445 of 2010
2

1. Petitioner shall report before the Investigating
Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all
Wednesdays.

2. The petitioner shall make himself available for
interrogation as and when required by the police till
the filing of the final report.

3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the
prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper
with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. The petitioner shall not commit any offence
while on bail.

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above

conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

This application is allowed as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

dmb


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

107 queries in 0.140 seconds.