High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Soni Kumar vs Union Of India & Others on 11 November, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Soni Kumar vs Union Of India & Others on 11 November, 2009
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                         CHANDIGARH.


                                     L.P.A. No.1221 of 2009(O&M)
                                      Date of decision: 11.11.2009

Soni Kumar.
                                                     -----Appellant
                               Vs.
Union of India & others.
                                                 -----Respondents


CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH

Present:-   Mr. B.S. Rathee, Advocate
            for the appellant.
                  ---


ORDER:

1. The appellant is aggrieved by order of learned Single

Judge, dismissing the writ petition against order of discharge

dated 1.9.2008, Annexure P-11.

2. The appellant served Indian Army for 19 years and

retired on 30.9.2006. He was re-employed in Defence Security

Corps on 9.4.2008, but on account of absence from duty, after

issuing show cause notice, order of discharge dated 1.9.2008

was passed.

3. Learned Single Judge held that there was no illegality

in the order of discharge, as under the rules, such an order could
LPA No.1221 of 2009 2

be passed and the same was not a disqualification for future

employment.

4. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant.

5. The appellant had only about two months service

when he proceeded on leave, which was not sanctioned, which

led to passing of the impugned order.

6. Whether the appellant had genuine reason for being

absent, is a matter which has to be considered by the competent

authority. Having regard to the fact that nature of employment of

the appellant was only re-employment and he had only rendered

two months service, we do not find any ground to interfere with

the view taken by learned Single Judge.

7. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant states

that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.

8. Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed.


                                        (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)
                                                JUDGE


November 11, 2009                          ( GURDEV SINGH )
ashwani                                         JUDGE