Gujarat High Court High Court

Special vs Ashwinbhai on 17 June, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Special vs Ashwinbhai on 17 June, 2010
Author: K.M.Thaker,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/4672/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 4672 of 2010
 

In
FIRST APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 5913 of 2009
 

To


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 4679 of 2010
 

In
FIRST APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 5920 of
2009 
=========================================================

 

SPECIAL
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & 1 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

ASHWINBHAI
AMBALAL PATEL - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
UMESH TRIVEDI ADDL. GP for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2. 
MR TRILOK J
PATEL for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER
		
	

 

Date
: 17/06/2010  
ORAL ORDER

Heard
Mr. Trivedi, learned Addl. G.P. for the applicants and Mr. Jayraj
Chauhan, learned advocate, for Mr. Trilok Patel, learned advocate for
the opponent.

Rule.

Mr. Jayraj Chauhan, learned advocate waives service of rule for the
opponent.

These
applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act are preferred
seeking condonation of delay of 147 days caused in filing the above
first appeals.

Having
regard to the averments made in the applications and considering the
submissions made on behalf of the contesting parties, it emerges that
the applicant was not negligent in filing the appeals. The applicant
has made out sufficient cause and has tendered satisfactory
explanation for condonation of delay. The applicants’ assertions or
averments in the application are not disputed or denied and have
remained uncontroverted in reply or affidavit and the application is
not opposed. Hence, the delay of 147 days caused in filing the above
appeals is condoned. The applications are allowed in terms of para
5(a).

Rule
is made absolute to the aforesaid extent in each of the application.

[K.M.Thaker,
J.]

kdc

   

Top