Gujarat High Court High Court

Special vs Dahyabhai on 20 July, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Special vs Dahyabhai on 20 July, 2011
Author: Jayant Patel, R.M.Chhaya,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/525/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY No. 525 of 2011
 

In


 

FIRST
APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 3253 of 2010
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 526 of 2011
 

In
 


FIRST APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER)
No. 3254 of 2010
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 530 of 2011
 

In
 


FIRST APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER)
No. 3258 of 2010
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 532 of 2011
 

In
 


FIRST APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER)
No. 3260 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================================


 

SPECIAL
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & 1 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

DAHYABHAI
LALABHAI - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MS.MOXA
THAKKAR, AGP. for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2. 
UNSERVED-EXPIRED (R) for
Respondent(s) :
1, 
========================================================= 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
		
	

 

Date
: 20/07/2011 

 

COMMON
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL)

1. The
present applications are for condonation of delay 309 days in
preferring appeal against judgment and award passed by the Reference
Court which is impugned in the First Appeal.

2. As
per the order passed by this Court today in C.A. Nos.5450 of 2011 to
5453 of 2011, the legal heirs of the concerned respondent who has
expired are brought on record. Mr. Yatin Soni, learned Counsel states
that the respondents have no objection for condonation of delay.
Hence, considering the facts and circumstances mentioned in the
application for condonation of delay coupled with the aspects that
respondents have no objection for condonation of delay, the delay
deserves to be condoned. Hence condoned. The applications are allowed
to the aforesaid extent. Rule made absolute.

3. Concerned
First Appeals be listed for hearing on 26.07.2011.

Sd/-

(Jayant
Patel, J.)

Sd/-

(R.M.

Chhaya, J.)

M.M.BHATT

   

Top