Gujarat High Court High Court

Special vs Jaymalbhai on 24 November, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Special vs Jaymalbhai on 24 November, 2010
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

FAST/2866/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

FIRST
APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2866 of 2010
 

To


 

FIRST
APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2867 of 2010
 

With
 

FIRST
APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2871 of 2010 

 

 


 

WITH
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION (STAMP NUMBER) No. 14146 of 2010
 

TO
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION (STAMP NUMBER) No. 14147 of 2010
 

WITH
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION (STAMP NUMBER) No. 14151 of 2010
 

=========================================================


 

SPECIAL
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & 1 - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

JAYMALBHAI
HIMATBHAI VASAVA - Defendant(s)
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MR
NIRAJ SONI ASST GOVERNMENT PLEADER
for Appellant(s) : 1 -
2. 
None for Defendant(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 24/11/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

By
way of order of even date passed in Civil Application No.13988 of
2010, delay caused in preferring the appeal is condoned and the main
matter is taken up for hearing today.

These
appeals are directed against the judgment and decree dated 07/05/2009
passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bharuch in LRC
No.461 to 466 of 1993.

It
has been the consistent practice of this High Court not to enter into
the merits of those appeals wherein the claim in appeal is small, and
claims upto Rs.1,00,000/- have been quantified by this Court as petty
claims. Since the amount involved in these appeals are less than
Rs.1,00,000/-, these appeal are dismissed without entering into the
merits of the matter. This order will not be treated as a precedent.

In
view of the dismissal of the main appeals, Civil Applications for
stay would not survive and are accordingly disposed of.

(K
S JHAVERI, J.)

sompura

   

Top