Special vs Rasikbhai on 1 September, 2008

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

FA/422020/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 4220 of 2008
 

With
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No.10275 of 2008
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 4222 of 2008
 

With
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No.10277 of 2008
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 4224 of 2008
 

With
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No.10279 of 2008
 

To


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 4225 of 2008
 

With
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No.10280 of 2008 

 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 4228 of 2008
 

With
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No.10283 of 2008
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 4230 of 2008
 

With
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No.10285 of 2008
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 4231 of 2008
 

With
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No.10286 of 2008
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 4233 of 2008
 

With
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No.10288 of 2008
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 4235 of 2008
 

With
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No.10290 of 2008
 

 
=========================================================

 

SPECIAL
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & 1 - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

RASIKBHAI
TRIBHOVANDAS PATEL & 1 - Defendant(s)
 

=========================================================

 

 
Appearance
: 
GOVERNMENT
PLEADER for
Appellant(s) : 1
- 2. 
None
for Defendant(s) : 1 -
2. 
=========================================================


 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 01/09/2008 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

1. The
amount involved in the appeals is less than Rs.25,000/-. It has been
the consistent practice of this Court not to enter into the merits of
those appeals wherein the claim is a petty claim. Claims up to
Rs.25,000/- have been quantified by this Court as petty claims.
Therefore, these appeals as well as the civil applications are not
entertained. They stand disposed of accordingly.

2. It
is, however, observed that the aforesaid order will not be treated as
precedent in other proceedings and for proceedings u/s. 28-A of the
Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

[K.

S. JHAVERI, J.]

Pravin/*

Top