IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
muss was THE 241" an or-' JUN§2{i:Q§II"~;.A4
PRESENT
THE HONBLE MR. P. D. DIhf,.*kD<fi.RAfl;'& I
THE Honma Mn;z¢sfncévgs;
8ETWEEN: %
sass mssmvamag mTERPR1sis
A Pmmgfisnzp FIRM *
M(wA£§If3G'~«PARTNER
SE1 N suamnaaavgiaa REDDY,
IIN9-5!;
opmvausmcz 1-1:357:51,
wmmi' I {J
asumy 5s:me3I
% % PETITIONER
my sat : L as Aw, )
I ' U fl fi H U fl V ' ' ' I ' ~.
I sTA1*E or KARNATAKA
a nap av zrs secammv
'rs eovemnearr
~ ' (MINES, 551 mu TEXTILES)
' " COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
em"
DEPARTM
94.5. BUILDING
BANGALORE 50 W1
!5...W£"M£mra wxomaxvr-nr» M
2 THE omecroa as MINES ma caeonorsy
Govazrmsm as acmmmcs % '
No.49, I6-IANIJA BHAVAN ,
RACE couase mm
BANGALGRE % W1
3 me DEPUTY omecron
or MINE AND eaowevy.
asumv, BELlARYV|.'3£5'.l'R1C'r_ *
4 THESENIORWOLOGIST' W e
aePARTMEm' or HI1§£%.€s:-.¥§-GEOLOt?£Y
aemmmr
seuanv msmicrr.
(By Sri csevemmzm
L%?1i4Is5s*vFf« Paéfins 10;;-» cm. me 'me
n z petmn is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of
of India saeldng far: quasi-ling of the erder
% éama 02.12.2086 (Annaxuro ''A') menu by an rim:
mspondent - Stan: of Karnataka, whcruin tho rwision
K)?»
W'WW'§'Wm§M'%='A¢""o.L2 I i8'fi$?Wkxn"'afi"*:s. « ammx ' .-'M
.....-......mmwm aruluwri mwmfii 'UT' mmtwawmfl WWW 600%"? 0? E{A&N&"WaK& HIGH fiflifim" W? Kfifimfiaffiafififi %§G§*M
in various quarries in the Stabs of icamataka. Fafitionar
had made an application for grant of in
respect of sy. Ho. 3.97 measttring 07 Acme cagr§kas%s:t-Jase
in Badanahatti viilaga, Salim-y Tami: .:mf_ud
dmcribod in the achoduh no %
Dimchor (Miami Mminiséraficny, v§h9 waéj'v_flié: 66:t;pou§tt
aflmr undo!" the Kyrrjgtaigg-"?~u1ui£3:rf' 'aAn=l §<T:oncmion
Rules, 1959 cherenaaftézf mam: Rule,
1069'') of the schaduia
PWP¢W:f¢T__3'_ 10 years. The said
Thar pctifiomlr has
made hugfvcy lakhs of rupow in
dcvoioping t§2éL...4guatV'fiv__."V the schadulo pmporty.
the petitionar, in ail, has
being the royalty and dead rant
Vin property in accardance with the
manna pig; KMHC mm, 1969. roatmcr mod an
w... W»-
rnmwn! of have and the same was not
tho rapondcats. As on 12.02.1%3, than
wakidfia of R3348:-=5GPs., and the mfifioner had paid the
amount as an that data. As an 219$. 1993,, there was
\/9»
§W}i£§~'w'?1"M§ fimfili-i'°W§»...ik mwfiw-fifiwrkrwmwau «ml awm
duo cf Rs.'748=a51Ps., and the same was paiefiby the
petitioner. There was no due whatsoever in
quarrying leasa. Thu pefitia:-tar applmd
said leans am 27.06.1994. Hawéva:;,_£he
for rmawal was nujnctad A':'w§§a_f:.<Ai§snfi
Dirochor of Him and GoVb<:b:§3'.on.v'ti*=13_V_ w,...u..t am.
am dumod usual u....;;.«s.¢ta..-. fila6d""farv§mnuwa¥ in
respect 0! the :chodu&£§,_';:z§9t;p;§§tyU.A§§';§gved by the ma
erdar at flag pgfiffaoner appnoached
the aaaogaé of Mina and Geology by
fiiinfl. 'rm mend mmnaam:
and directed flu third
rcspondisnf 6:9 spplicatbn for renewal of ham.
A' ..... fiuarrying lease was renewed an
. ;'i8.1€):.
z It is furthor mmrud that for the period from
V. " tfli 18.16.1997, than was no ma 5::
and thorn was no quarrying aparwfen talcum up I
'" ¢:onti\nued by the petlfionar an accnunt of non-mnewal of
31¢ quarrying base grarstm earlier. Therein:-3, the claim
«/3
?w%a.w:'e.m...zums vewm .1" M. .... 'V' . .
of dud rant cr royalty does not aria. Siam the péfitiomr
has not ban permkud to carry an the
by wk-hue of the action of the authoI'ims,"A« t_:|:1a.
cannot make a claim for dand:-r'c!hi:;«.
28.05.1993 as 18.19.1997. a....:;uon......mt .;.......a
no conduct tm Ql.laf't'yI'iz-5%-..:;:';;i."§za>ratAi:<V.)¥'i$..'&!IV1d_V'_:5§:i§fi&!,
pufiuomr cannot by "_;it_n1iit::_._beefih"t:c:néucti:tg the
quarrying opemtionsiui-'$6 'tiic: zjannot claim dud
rent. Afwf the mm
in qustin;rg1"byv'é§z4$£4::er.Vd#;aad 13.19.1997. It as
furtixsafi» Md fibd W.P.
court and this Court dirucmi
flint poiidifig. cf fine applicalson for manual,
V' '_ parmittm m excavaee, narmve and
a«¢%~Gr§n:m blocks from the schedule property.
In by dais Court on 01.09.1995,
...i_A...,V'........ ... mmuw-umau-c mun mwum W? wwwwmmmh WQZWE Klfltiflfi" OF WmMA'¥"fikK& Evfififi fiflfimf WE mmmmm Mfififi €
_V wtit§f§¢"4r.:_v&a§ not pcnnkud tan carry on an quarrying
1' A éoffaccount of non-monewai of the quarry luau
an powomr. Powmr was infnrmw by tbs
'J » . _ rupondes-ct that it shun not be permittaad no canduct
quarrying operations unfit and unless there 3 renewal
V./5
s\""§é""'§"'°'flx mm"; in mmwmrrm an
af have in accordarm with the Karnataka Minofiflinura!
and Connexion Rule, 1994 (heminaflw 2;:
'the scum: lulu, 19:4'). LL
again on 13.05.2001, rfiipszrfjiénitt
dnmnding paynunt:-sf Rs,..i'3,;9 $,"$:58[-. 'Thin pitiuvncr on
realm cf the Rs.2S,0.00l- on
2a.os.2oo1%% far the permits for
ifigain, the wfiwner made
pamanzégfi%%%§fi&:m%%gum& ¢¢=ka¢§.2s,ooo/- on 01.10.2001
undfisj slaoppod issuanfia of
mincralVV'€is§pataV§: h- for transpormtion of Granius of
§
5'?
3
59
J
E
§
2
§
§
§
$2:
3
E
:2
3
3
vgethgar the pefitioner. The fourth
wwanwmm
».._considering the law applicabie, has
am 21.09.2602, caning upon the
m%§p%.§ a sum of as.14,s3,7ss/-- being me
A éaaafiwrunt. Pfiner dcputw his cmpioyus and
" tho notice of was fourth mswndcnt that than
is mt labia no pay tha and rent during the
from 28.95.1993 to 18.10.1997 what thare was Ira
Kr)'
2.2 It 5 ruram .m.¢.na..
f'M*"<;°°*?¢ mmmx mmaswramwxm mm....m P9 4 w m.
MEQH W
§
2
§
$33.;
§
éfé
3
Q
a;
X
E?
E
%
E
%
§
$9:
Q'
§
3
3
.3
:
§
§
§
E
2
2
i
E
§
§
g
E
?
§
M...» -«MW vr w
was cancelled am: imrrlndiauu effect and tt1o.J' isTcurity
depmit mafia by the poul.-Inner in that regard
2-3 was unarmed bv%~m
26.03.2W mead by firs
potitionar mm mm. court
conmding mat mqugrryzag fi§a§"'¢3pir*§d"¢n"§7.05. 1993
and the lease was 18.10.1997 and
wherefore, rasmndent far
payrrsent;6§"'d¢$%i"?V'&f§n:£,jf§Ah. from 28.05.1993 to
18.16. §nt£""*i;ithout authority of law.
the writ petition, the fourth
mpondang mm me: mad 11.03.2004
¢:§:_'3*:E:5§n;_';_; 't29_oi's V war to pay 3 sum of Rs.9,46,380/-.
' pg§§§e§i§r_cha¥hnged the said letter dated u.o3.2m4
H ' ukenond respondent in nevsbrs petition
The ascend ruspondont, by order dated
AA3i.._1O.2004, aflowod um revision pctifion and dimchnd aw
_ auflwrity ho pmvws opportunity to firs ‘
‘V “”petitioner and on satisfactory mpty, mark the payment
mega-cg in mind the order passed by thk Cam! in ma.
VS
£”¥w”‘§u'”‘*e. Q iM£**9;.:eaa »< m..mme.u..mm.ms. «win» ..
……. mm.” W ommwmmm $”MEWW mmwwwm wr” mmmwwwtmmm mamw awmmw war’ ewmmmmwsm 3M%%::ii”% mmum WE” mywmmm WW4 £3!
No.38462[1989 (Jyothi Brothws Vs. State of Karaatala).
ms Court by onder dam: 13.m.2cce, agmmakgm.
No.38158/2003 with liberty so the mtitmniigff mmr 5*
ravision patitim under Rule .’E-3′{“1)~ af ‘ ,the; ‘ Q
1994, wmxin 30 days from tho 9?.
at an order. rim. mum
No.CU156/MMNl2m6bafer§ mm” iesmxianz. Tho
am mponaent by 5:’-fir rajecead the
ravsion confirmed the
order – master of Mines
and canceilirifl an sum
” V petitioner for quarrying Gray
Granfibnh land and may amount due
i§m_.._nt:fitEoner is orderfi be: be recovared as
‘ rave:-xua. Being aggriaved by fine said ondar
H ” pwfioner has fled this writ Pemn for
ui. ‘fluid riliofs.
3. Notice was issued to the rnspm-dams.
V
I¥¥Ns«’fIW’R *5o.w’vvui*Q:#3’%Vfi ‘?mfl’€3’ V§.”5M””M9$ ‘%,§f’% ” ‘ . .
II $I*€9fi””%3’£éf”‘§7.§~ §8fi3s’€I»W&\’2 ‘flméflfi bV”%am?.T””i%§z\’i5a§’EW+$””M5(.RI”-?hi?%”%a§”ti~ Hwwwvw wwwmm WWI! B1″M1″‘*&&”ieI£”€7w”%sm””m»<V&J¢'"t\ mmwwmmzz wwflwwwfim *nnsfl'm uuuwmnwuswam–«mans» we #3.:
4. We havu head the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner and the leamed Gwernmant Advocaea
appaaring for $3 recpcndenm. »
5. Learned scum: app-arm ‘°’
submitted that fllfli we no
pctifiomr to pay the dead rm: fnf the
of expiry af lam i.e., 27.05.1593 *2; of 33
rmewal i.e., 18.1Q19$€? for
payment of dead by the
first raspovrdcxgg. the was
passed by amu 26.03.2003,
c:muiIAifig’_’ granud in favour of tbs
mid reccwery of me armunt due in be
A 1′ as arrests of land revenue 3 iiabh no
= cannsai further submitted Swat the
V i&ipmV§jid’ “or’dsrw passed by mspondnmt Mum. and 2 an
” fl®fl%ffiGbh and suffer from cmar apparent on the fact
6f tho order and whemrfom, the writ petifion may be
affowed.
vs-
_– -._ .. …-….M.. wwwna wt’ mmwwvmififlfl mam mwwm Q?’ KfiR?”§A?&§(A Nifififi QQURT 0? mmwmm Hififl $4
31%
-13..
7. We have given canafui consideratiorswo the
contaenfions cf the fiaarned eounsai ”
parties and scrutinizad the material on
8. Thu mniaurial agn
patitioner was gmntacd qfiafijring 1
mfition schodulo poriw of
10 years. The ¢_on 27.95.1993.
Thasreafter,_.,t§i;§ -_. §n appligation for
mnawai by order dated
1s.1c.199?.. %% with cfiuct mm
28.65. 10 wars as par Annwtum ‘ F’
and wh§rs_for§, no murit in the conianfion of the
V¢_:a:::.:V’1′-sTs’ina;i….._a__;:zpearing for ma mastic;-zer that am
w§§~r’fsQ:t”vahbh to pay dead rent for axe pariod
3-;ea.ag%…: of base i.e., 23.95.1993 to the
of ‘itsz i.s., 23.10.1997. Lam has but:
« ordsr mu: 23.10.1997 mm effect from
” for: period of 16 years and me said fast is not
The material on record weuid shaw flat the
did not make appfication for mnewal of base
\/’>
£”‘i:.#”°W’£:. zmmme 3% mmamsmm. MW n:va.».
….W WJQJMKS 1}!” fiflfiflflfiflfifl HIUH LWUN! W?” Mmmmmmm WIUVWI
within tirm as the avarmcrm mad: in the pctitimj imlf
would show me: me pefibkmer mad; at: app¥j£e:a:’j&¢»)rs~.v_’for
grant of renewal of lease on 27.96.1994 i.a§;;i;
of lease. The fact that an petftioa’er.’1’fiii;§’ Tfi;}§””p§§;i em’
amount dun an be paid be tho .
and dead mat amounting dat;é
of istuanm of datpdV j111″1_3.O6.2@§1,VAVVfitarmet be
dkputxed. Since my the arrears of
royalty and in the natice
mead {ease to become
eohdiaona of Iona dud.
éancsileti and thu amount due
no he paid rospondsntc k ordtrod
#5 land mvanue in exmzae sf
?i.r=:– first smpondarst. Therefone, having
rn-sharia! on record, it is clear that
irnpiigneij. cancaliing than have and ardering
étfiaunt dam to in paid by an wtftionar as
rut”! Wgfigiffiditlé MW” W1?-tmWinnE5*LIU’\ fllwfi MWUKQ WT mmnmatmnfl
‘afland mronuu pawod by the first raspondcnt is
The first mspondent has rightly confirrned Elm
paged by the manna respondant dated 26.03.2063,
»uu-«wan -an-ururamp -aver nu-ar’u|r\I’I§J”tar”Ii\l’l In
\./9*
–_.. wwwna Ur mnmumxmw. NW?! COURT (W KARNA’FflK& flfifié-i €@E..W”¥” Q? @€fléWWA’¥%%& HIQH €
wmmin, rm been granmi in favour of ma pafitkmgr was
cancelled as petitioner had wowed the “to
become maxed and did not pay tbs
the amount dapmiew by me:-‘gefitionér Rims’ *
bun forfeilaad. Uncior flu ‘Jciré;;–§ifa1szané«;§’,–~.’VVti:§
quwmn of irr1;:!arr:¢ntifi§v:.}:’L:”i:.*1o 6rd§_r»..
mrisionul authority ;n_m:s:aa{ an; meoring
flue lease gm-read Er; ?.§_v:§x:rff–.’¢f would not
aim and me. any retief sought
for in thgv.;’rfitV hate! that the writ
p¢titir,§–n–w[is; than foflowing OfdIf:-
bmimd.
Sd/~
Chief Justicé
Sd/1»
JUDGE:
' 'T . . _ index: Yes/Na Wub Host : You/No
5§no§t%’e3’§t;5§¢% W’MVm$’§.’@wuEf!.%3’&.0£’6mfi\Jt um sown