High Court Kerala High Court

Sreekumaran Nair vs Sakthi Finance Ltd. on 20 March, 2007

Kerala High Court
Sreekumaran Nair vs Sakthi Finance Ltd. on 20 March, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

FAO No. 170 of 2006()


1. SREEKUMARAN NAIR, MURINGAL PARAMBIL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SAKTHI FINANCE LTD., ERNAKULAM BRANCH
                       ...       Respondent

2. MRS.T.T.VALLIAMMAL,

3. MR.MAHALINGAM, 26/824, SANJAY NAGAR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.P.ABRAHAM (SR.)

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.K.DILEEPAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :20/03/2007

 O R D E R
                      KURIAN JOSEPH & K.T. SANKARAN, JJ.

                   ...................................................................................

                                      F.A.O. No. 170   OF  2006

                  ...................................................................................

                                 Dated this the 20th March, 2007




                                             J U D G M E N T

Sankaran, J:

The petitioner, who is the third defendant in O.S. 205 of 2002 on

the file of the Sub Court, Ernakulam filed I.A. Nos. 3063 of 2005 and 3062

of 2005 to set aside the ex parte decree passed against him, after

condoning the delay. Those applications were posted on 03.04.2006.

The appellant and the counsel were absent on that day and therefore the

court below dismissed the applications. I.A. Nos. 2093 of 2006 and 2094

of 2006 were filed to restore I.A.Nos. 3063 of 2005 and 3062 of 2005

respectively. The court below dismissed those applications by the order

impugned in this appeal.

2. The case of the appellant is that the advocate’s clerk had noted

the date as 04.04.2006 instead of 03.04.2006 and therefore the counsel as

well as the appellant were absent before the court on 03.04.2006 when the

case was called.

F.A.O. No. 170 OF 2006

–: 2 :–

In the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking a lenient

view in the matter, we are inclined to set aside the order impugned on

condition that the appellant shall pay a sum of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two

thousand only) as costs to the first respondent . In the result, F.A.O. is

allowed on condition that the appellant shall pay a sum of Rs. 2,000/-

(Rupees two thousand only) as costs to the first respondent within a period

of three weeks from today. Costs shall be paid to the counsel appearing

for the first respondent

KURIAN JOSEPH,

JUDGE.

K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

lk