Srei Equipment Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Mr.Shantanu Sarkar And Anr on 8 June, 2011

0
39
Calcutta High Court
Srei Equipment Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Mr.Shantanu Sarkar And Anr on 8 June, 2011
Author: I. P. Mukerji
                              AP No. 515 of 2011

                     IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

                 Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction

                                ORIGINAL SIDE




                   SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE PVT. LTD.
                                 Versus
                      MR.SHANTANU SARKAR AND ANR.



      BEFORE:

      The Hon'ble JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI

      Date : 8th June, 2011.

                                             Mr.Swatarup Banerjee, Adv.,
                                             for the petitioner.
                                             Mr.Pradip Kumar Roy, Adv.,
                                             for the respondent no.1.

The Court : This is a Section 9 application.

It is made after a Section 17 application made by the

petitioner-financier. The purpose of the Section 17

application was to obtain possession of an excavator which

was the subject matter of the loan-cum-hypothecation

agreement between the parties. Although the learned

Arbitrator passed a direction for a custodian to take
2

possession of the excavator, that order could not be carried

out.

Hence, this application. It is submitted that the hirer

has admitted in the counterclaim before the Arbitrator that

Rs.30 lakh was owing by him to the petitioner. The petitioner

wants orders for possession of the excavator.

From the submissions of the learned Advocate for the

petitioner it appears that the monthly hire of this excavator

is Rs.2,54,400/-. The learned Counsel for the hirer, however,

submits that this amount was for two equipments, one of which

is not the subject matter of this application.

Whether the hirer has admitted Rs.30 lakh or not has to

be determined on affidavits. But the fact remains that the

hirer is in possession of the equipment and not paying any

amount for its use.

In those circumstances, I appoint Mr.Netai Chand Manna,

Bar Association as Receiver at an initial remuneration of 700

GMs to be paid by the petitioner to take symbolic possession

of the excavator which is located near Ruby Hospital in

Kolkata without disturbing the possession of the hirer. The

hirer will without prejudice to the rights and contentions of

the parties pay Rs.1,50,000/- per month from June 2011 to the
3

petitioner-financier as hire charges. Such hire charges are

payable by the seventh of the succeeding month. This means

that hire charges for June have to be paid by the 7th of July,

2011. In default, the petitioner will be at liberty to apply

to this Court to take appropriate measure for possession of

the excavator.

Affidavit-in-opposition be filed by 28th June, 2011. List

this application on 12th July, 2011. Affidavit-in-reply may be

filed in the meantime.

I also pass an order of injunction in terms of prayer

(f) till the disposal of this application.

All parties concerned are to act on a signed photocopy of

this order on the usual undertakings.

                            (I.       P. MUKERJI, J.)


Sd/
 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here