High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri A M Basavarajaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri A M Basavarajaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
wuawm-gm vmvmrvqaamm wu aw-eamnwwwawuwm wewlrw mwwflfi WW W.W&ME%éW§E&»%§%«uM WEWWW KUWKE W? §'>L.35&fiWfi"§}&K.& Wiféw 

:1»: am Hm: COUFEZ' or  .  T T

mm Ms M 09"'  

35293;

mm mm' 31.3 mm. Jusnc.-is  G'r itAiE§RSV$I

wan  :ié§41£;<$§:rsv;:.-gifis)'%%%

nxmm:
sax A It   
5/0      ..
AGED i:|.»§E3IIf:'.'"'~§5 j 
s2cm?rm   ,   
Aim amt  %
310 mm  
mvmmezlaaz. '. *    %

. . . PETITIONER

csy %sz1%  €x%'£*  am 2

 am é*'uar.*r$Voi§§ mummy;

 «pm BY 321:3 smcmmz
 % nxymmr or co-ommxm
 n..s.m:zmms
-  %«::an mum
* Vgaxweaznmwol

~   nxeztsmna or co-omnarrm

SOGIEFY, ALI  R039




um. W--nur-I--wII:a -v-» ..w..mu..u~u-ew-m-»-nu

B.ME~AI.ORE

3 DEPUTY REGISTRAR 0!'
CO'*0P3Rfi'.1'IVE SOCIETY
Gfi A DISTRICT   
t'.3I  I

4 DEPUTY REGISTRAR O!' . _
CO'-OPRRR'1'IVE SOCIETY V  
EA  DISTRICT
ERVBNFLGBRIE

5 mm LABOUR cmassxmmg «L 
Imam nzpnxfirxmrziwj    % 
  

6 sU9nnvIé9n:;%<is1ii5'"o£§it;A:i;s:;L:;i;at1:nA1'on
 1:351'  
cwranx.  ~  gmmxm

7 mnmm  %  '  %
 'c  aatmm mm

V 
"  .. . azsmmnms

 sash  ma E03. R1 '1'!) as
 36- ssmtgz mm szmxcmzr mm
 i.? $__RI.x mzmflm-I R arm, ms: ran my

__  rim uunznmmms 225 ms 227
 o1i*?s§13z'-»c:'e*31~Is'1'I':%:I'r::c3aI or man mmxm TO BIRRCT
 as mm 35 cm mmmmmam sways T0

a»/"'



nmw THE mam: 9399213 32 mm LmQtn£f%'};cLm.r

maze.-3.1975 mm: Am-A,m nxsx-'v:rm«?jirc§;.x11a.{'13fé'5_
our TEE £11.: D? mm mm coU1e'r,4j'%:%.1n:j;,; 
use T9 mpnmmn ma st,rs§Qtmr:%  ,_PA'$S"EID i

3': fim mnotm COURT, H:*sks:;:"'%T11t'%%vza1=§':,.I<*gs;::?i<ja¢

No.40/1997 M.11.6.1§ 91_V, Ami-<:.% {AAT;:%%gga: n~::§%

AHOURT nun T0 mm'. 1?E T=Z!;V"1'I@TEI'{'--'1uf€J'V':2'o.:'f§'1'tINB or
ns.s,3o, 900/----  2;:  jrc  kwp.

ms mp.   THIS um,
um   

.....w.,,..,,.. W wwwnaumamnm mm «Mm-2 W mmmmm Mfifilzm mum' W mmmmm mm mm

The  fox: iaauance cf
suit our   d£,_i:&a.§ting that Respondent

1§1T¢ia.._3, 6 appropriate steps to

passed by the Labour

24+-1975 at annmu;e–~a in

,uIZ’«._j!«I.i”fi/ and 3.130 to imlement: the
_ A Qwarct dated 11-6-1991 passed by the
€:’«A::urt, I-Iuhli in I.D.No.40/8′? and tar pay

{mount due to tho petitianox to the tuna

! L”

mmmaw-mwsv-qnwr’u eta-Wm: WWMNK “hawk: mwmwsmmnmnm [¢”r%l¥%”#’&'”3′ ‘%n%:I7’¥ox§fl

of Ra.B,30, 900)’-‘ as per Annaxura-H to

partition.

2. Hand the leat:1ed: “._

respective: parties .

3. It in the §§h&i$§i;§ }§fi tha learned
counsel despite the
ward <:§£ ';¥:<.:cpt payment of
; :'iI;; 'P"..':GI.»-.-V towards axzeaxs,

were mt attended to
than that he was not taken

a.{ii€:a…_.I.1.av in already and 85 years. By

' the mam passed by that Labour ceurt

H been imlctnentsd, necessarily

t$£z',§5nxman is entitled to all the

eeaalfiuantial hamtita including been-1 wages
tha date of the award till ha attuinud

'H auperaxmuati on.

r”

§¥\v

. .m.m.m.m.m Huswrm mmm «W mmmmamm wmmgaew €’_;waE.J3m’ KW mmmmm RWW 66%}

4 .. Per cantxa, than learned

Gwetmsnt Advocate aumittod

hem ordered in tho

workman cxcatat a dixactiéésn

2.5.54, no/-. zecaa:::in4_§§::g tr§az~, hath’

paid and nothing Ha
fuzthez auhmittafi cannot
avail any” ‘amount due to
him hug; §sW;:er tha order on
tho ,%p1g,; the question of
payfiggt “the arrears amount doea
not arise, specific order in

!;h:i.§ …..

appearing for respondent

._§I¢;.’? that this rcsporxdant is mat the

the petitioner and the petitioner

have imleaded the ‘7″ respondent-

W M WWWWWVWXKI wm xawmmmmumauwu wuwrrmi wwumx W? mmfimwuflwfl Mfwfl Lwwe

6. It apptars the potritionar: aongg_§ifV”-h:”Lj’.!;’5z

inwlamentation of award of the yen:

nearly 33 years. It is tisi”a:g>q¢i.’L£:F§§V’V:vc;a§s.ibaf;

the petiticsner that V .

rnpzosentatians and ‘Econ ‘V

considered. It ngpxg-§’gfit§ti§fis’*-A mt
boon considered, :§§\i $¢»..:.§§titioncz to
have reaougfs.-at *_::_o to
iwluwontf ::’ j::’r13;.2′: thn auimiasion
made, Society 13 under
liquirglatifiné the question of

1:einsta:tuéri:x_§int: ‘ S patitionéx: eannat he

at…….2;3uiu length of times as he in

all these aspects in the writ
“§6’€ifi5fij_ Véiuvvftor at lugs: :32? 33 you. Due t

laxchas, this petition does not

LL %sm;v.. it at all, my paw:.-Lem: had filed

such cantomt pxzcceudimgn, he cauld have

V availed the remedy at the relevant point at

W/_

M. m…….w “U”! m..~…..m-wmmm mww vuwwm may mKw%’¥’fim Er.r

dixaction does no; “‘ ssm¢ is

hereby diamiaaod. $ ” ‘

@121’-* _