9 'V v«.T-TVBE:"AsSiS"-MN? COMMISSIONER
' ~ . *3 TA}i'S:IL9AR
5.5 CHIEF GFFICER
IN THE men coum' ore' KARNATAKA, _
DATED THIS THE 24m my 0;' JUNE_».,~V2"lA$§9: I 3
BEFORE . ' K V
THE I-IOEPBLE MR. JusTzcE_4gAn§'---nééumy
I WRIT PETITION' 140.523
BETWEEN
SEE A M EHESAN ULLA PATEL~. . - '
SfG H M 1:'AzAuLLA;.$A1~1EB: A '
AGED ABOUT 5'2v4Yi%1A_RS" _ H .
R/AT 10 warm, ,aN,JAN-EYA'Tfr:*e.ADAivA;%§EV'
HARAPPANAHALILI, ' «:¢;'_:g\VAr'ir3ERE ._ V
T' A' _ PETITIONER
{By Sri {B M SiDfL3A§?PA, A.1j>V..) -- -
AND
2 EH3 %.{_)E15U*;'3{' CGMEAISSIQNER
1:19rR;cr.
HARAPANAHALLI TQWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
HARAPANAHALLI, DAVANGERE DISTRICT.
5 REGISTRAR
KARNATAKA STATE LOKAY"U§{'§'A
\%
Ge; /
3 V'p8fitil'3f}€if'f}1}1.1}fCha$€§WlAV acre: of land under 3. registered
10- E994, and gut up construction of
"* 5i;' <«.__13:3;gme1étv.q_§:}f building tax. It is the ailsgation of the
VA Tijétitififier that the 431 respondent issued a flotice dated
-3:_3.:2(){)8 AI}I1€X1}I'(‘)-“E” stating that the petitioner
~ ‘ <%:r:c:mac:hed upon property belonging to the templa and
M S BUILDiN'GS,BANGALORE 1. Raspéwpéfirsfis 2
(By 3:-3; R DEVADAS, AGA FOR R1 'I'.€3rR.'_3)' _
(BY SRi. V'? RAYA REDDY, ADV FOR R4)___ j; _
(av SR1. GOUTHAMADEV £:.U1..LAL, A§)V¥§"<'GR R5)_ ._ _ ~
THIS WRIT PETITION IS F3.LE.:3 UNEER .ARr1cLEs..::26
Arm 227 OF THE coNs'r1TuT;O=:~{V CEF' INDEA PEAYING TO
QUASH THE NOTICE mt 12.3.20{38_ I$sUEm«BY THE R4
PRGDUCED AS ANX~G To 'mg WRI'E'— PETITION AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETIT1QN;"' :c0MI.h.;<}__ om FOR
PRELIMINARY HEA;RING,"If\'i*–'.I3' '€':. '.OU?, .,{m1s BAY, THE
COURT MADE 'IfEi'E««.§f' C)LL£)W;ING: Z
Pefiitibzxefivf, be _i:Iié owner of tine land
bearing 'Sy';N<}V….:f£arapanahai]i, which was
granted _ to =E3_éid.ai* from whom the
a — supply of electricity followed by
was dirmteé to vacate the premises. It is asserted that
M
Annexures "E" and "G" direct the p€1iZ'fi1i{)I}..f¥.I,"v_A4_:'ii{)VV Veggcatei» V' "
the premises without an opportunity 4'
4. It is elsewhere .
distinction between the iii-» ‘:{“‘c’)’Iicwe'<i1 in a
quasi judicial proceeickmifgi £_é_e?:mmistrafive
proceeding in principies of
natural j¥.1st;iCé- _ ». »-
5. {The _ made out a case for
interferencefdie iiieciieliowed in part. The notice
dated’ Z_;2″~{)3~2{){}8V_VA:inei:ure~”G” in so far as it reiates to
ijetitioner to vacate the premises within 7
dié;y.s”‘i’i§s«ii The 4711 respondent is directed to
V consider t§1e’;’5etitioner’s explanation A:rmexure~”H” and
K ” < .a.1fcie:'s thereon, in accordance with law.
36155
Tudgré"
KS