Sri A M Vishwanathaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 July, 2008

KAMIATAKA HIGH COURI' OF KARNATAKA a-IGH coma op g(,qgNA3-AKA 54131.. '

'n\:vr'I uuum ur nnxmnuusn HIUH LQUKI UP KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARHATAKA, BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 29'" DAY OF JULY 
Bmmm "   

THE HOIPBLE MR. JUSTICE    

1 smnnvmnwummamfl
310 mm
mm amour L n =
ace: ma.1cUL’rUR:m * *
moAmm:LE. , x k

my 8ri ;- )

. . {rm i_zs*i=?;x*1€”m’ or

mm z>3mmr<}cumsIoNm

&
% § « om

ANEEAL,

…… ……… .. ……………\.. ruun x.f..rr««1_g(: ur mmmmm HIGH COURT os KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH court or mRNAfAk:WWWm

H16!-I C

-4..

ctxltzivatien. Thus, these. diaplaced pa:-sons have rm

peutsoxm in bafiore this Court soaking the

refief.

S_!r.Ha.-119, which is The said
land faces up In the It ‘3
the:rea1’tm’. um-as land and the
mad. is that tin
the persons who are
the fmmge to the

pa!:ifianer”s 3 ‘no am Ins occupéed tb

heim xutharitiau can never grant

up patw shops on the fiootpath.
petitioner”: land is inmct and h’:

A mm in not disturbed. On the mm
that pm-sans could occupy the foot-path
% the pemmer frontage no writ much less a
of muzndnnnn could be isuuad as on the am of