High Court Kerala High Court

Sri. Aliyar vs Sri.K.A. Shamz on 10 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
Sri. Aliyar vs Sri.K.A. Shamz on 10 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 100 of 2009()


1. SRI. ALIYAR,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SRI. KUNJUMON,
3. SRI. MOIDU,
4. SRI.PAREETH
5. SMT. PATHUKUTTY
6. SMT. NABEESA, W/O. ASSAI, MATTATHIL
7. SMT. RUKHIYA W/O. BAKKER, PERIMBINCHALIL

                        Vs



1. SRI.K.A. SHAMZ S/O. ALI,
                       ...       Respondent

2. A.P. MEERAN, S/O. PAREETH, ALAKKAL

3. M/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.ANILKUMAR

                For Respondent  :SRI.MATHEWS JACOB (SR.)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :10/03/2010

 O R D E R
                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
              = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                M.A.C.A. NO. 100 OF 2009
            = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        Dated this the 10th day of March, 2010.

                      J U D G M E N T

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Muvattupuzha in O.P.(MV)949/04.

An 85 year old lady died and it is alleged that it is on account

of a road accident. The Tribunal merely relying upon the

statement in the wound certificate or in the hospital records

jumps to the conclusion that the cause of injury is on account

of a giddiness and fall in the house and dismissed the

application. The Tribunal shuts its eyes to the documents

prepared by the investigating agency and produced before

the Tribunal. There are false cases before the Tribunal but

the court has to convince itself that it is a false case with the

materials available on records. The court did not attempt to

do it. Interestingly the claimants also did not adduce proper

evidence to establish and satisfy the conscience of the Court

that the injury was sustained on account of a motor accident.

M.A.C.A. 100 OF 2009
-:2:-

I think better wisdom will prevail on the claimants and they

can produce documents and adduce evidence and if

necessary examine the investigating agency so that the real

picture will be before the Court for a proper disposal of the

matter.

2. Therefore the award under challenge is set aside

and the matter is remitted back to the Tribunal with a

direction to permit all concerned to produce documentary as

well as oral evidence. I make it clear that I am not

expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. Parties are

directed to appear before the Tribunal on 19.4.2010.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-