IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAI-(A
CRICUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 08"?" DAY oF FEBRUARY,l'_io'Iojf {T .
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE ARAII .ii~TIA'e/§;r2;AJA'»~j;I_
CRIMINAL PETITIOI'-J.__ _ND.T71,i76,/202;Ii'%r
BETWEEN:
1.
_ Dist : Bé'ga|kot"
Sri.Amarappa _
S/D Sangappa Agasirnundiri
Age: 50 years, Oc;::.:.Ag'ricultLire 1" "
R/0 Benkanaadonii; V' - ' "
Tc:;:Hun_gung;§H'r'i'_. _
Dist:E3agé:;i--.kot'3'..__
smt.A'rnaramma _ .
W,/0 'Ame rarjpha' Ag"asi m U ndin
Age:4'5 yeaVrs,.fjQ.cC':..é_Hrousehold work
R/D "E3e_n'1<anacioni,"Tq~:Hungund
T PETITIONERS
V' --(l3y":H&§"ri :iSrin"a..nd Pétfhhapure, Adv)
Aiwéii It 7!]
Theétate.of':-Kernataka
By PSI, *I|ka'vl"Po|ice Station
repfoy HCGP
RESPONDENT
S”‘ri:P.H.Gotkhindi, HCGP)
This Crl.P is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
T ‘praying to grant bail to the petitioners with conditions in
,…~..<_M\'¥/*1
Crime No.83/2009 registered for the offences punishable
under Sections 341, 324, 326, 504 and 307 read—-__with
Section 34 of IPC by the respondent Ilkal Police Statio.n.’r._V
This Cri.P is coming on for Orders this _
made the following:
Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 herein are
accused Nos.1 and 2 in Cr.No..;;83,/2OO’9._of.1AIfka|”i§VS,””ia!uk 3′ V
Hungund, District Bagaikot haveV:fi’i~ed*~-.the pfresenti petition
under Section 439 of Cr’.”‘P;itC_.I’.-
2. Iniitiafiiy, ‘ the sa’id”cri’me “iN’as.Vvregistered against
these petitioneajs§.a.cci3se,d”:5foti ‘the offences under Sections
341, 3.24, 5044 réafd-».,§zviti?§”‘s§2ction 34 of IPC on the basis of
the combiaint, the injured complainant
Smt,,Qa>’V<n'iavvaV""a»fie_g_ing that both these accused, in
'*__fL£i'i£§73€vl'c3.,I']C'E.?'«Qf'vtheil' common intention of causing her
death, aVssa'.L;fte:d"V.her and thereby inflicted severe injuries.
.¢Howe'v¢r',V,'Va'fter completion of investigation, chargesheet
"'¢.~4;:a"me,_toVV"'be filed against these accused for the offences
-3ff.-din-derf:Sections 341, 324, 326, 504 and 307 read with
3 Section 34 of IPC.
W
.—.,.o.tIjev–‘:s._n:at:Ure the”‘i’njuries sustained by the injuredia-Ha
3. Both these petitioners–accused were granted
bail by the learned Magistrate during investigation»_::’Att~er
submission of the chargesheet, the bail order-*canjeV–.tjo-.Tbe_T’~-
cancelled on the application filed b_y…t.h_e prosecutjion”’on’.the_ ”
ground that the chargesheet carneto be fi’le«d.aga:i’nstifimesej
petitioners-accused for the ‘o_ffeynces”vunder ‘Sect’ivo.nVs 5326
and 307 also.
4. The accused’a_r_e have assaulted the
injured with st.i:ci<s and'ti1ereby'—-,_caVused the lacerated
wound on 'with dislocation / of left fore
arm. by the learned Counsel for the
petitioners~accu*sVed{jV'~_even~.if the entire case of the
prosecutionis V_acceIpted its face value, having regard to
0-«–!",';"*'":"
,_th’ese p:e’t.it%ievnersjxsaccused would not be liable to be inflicted
with_Vmaxi.rni’uV.i’n sentence of imprisonment for life which is
“-..Drescri’bVeél for the offence under Section 307 of IPC.
r’~–«~(‘~”\”””””