Sri Anant Mahadev Pawar vs Sri Manohar Yallappa Chougle on 30 May, 2008

IIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH Cf.'Ji;£RT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH I

§§'THE$}§H3§3CX}EflTC§?Ffl§§$%K?fi$fl§fKFEMKN{$fiLCH?E
mmm TEES ma am BAY OF MAY 2&3}8}V--':'f"}.V:"~_
mmm   CM
THEfi$HBLEER$U3%$EMmHAH$fiA&§fl$C#fi@§%F7H

1-may zx%':;:.133_QF 2fl$a%(£x£:;%%%C '. «C C 

 

223 Afi%fiT Maaxazv Enwagg :j¢'

3&3 éfi ?EAR3 T C~*<

Q52 EUS§&ESEA, _w~_=.'-A; "V "g
RES 1953 Axaa?a6fiE3R§ §AeL:4;, "u
gzaamaw i §vV . '1_' 'A." "*"
wg & §zs?"EE&@&§gV«.»

V.___CWC"Va,, .... CCVC a=1,,59EmIw:c:3n

my§fi;§yfmfi$mz&mwxma,mwq ;

"u.§%:'R£fiaaRR.xAaaa§PA HGQGLE
3C.§£E EAJGRM"

'jfi£$_3$g:§E3s

-_~,'gg@$s.§m 4 APTEKER $A&£I
-»7mamamwAR RQAB
fifihéfiflfi

... RISPGIOKI?

_ ._". Tfiifi BEEP I3 Flbsfi GEE 115 GF THE CFC
-V fififiififi? ?fiE JU3$EMEfiT REE BECREE ET. 19.2.08
E E33353 Z3 H§fi.R§.fiG. Béia? ca ?RE FILE 0? TEE III

§3§La EEE?RECT Jflfififi, EELQRUM, 3153155135 THE
agvxgzam ?ET1?1m& .n&n C$fiFIEHI§Q $33 GRBER. Afifi
afifikfifi ST.2€.E.Q? PAEEED Ix SEC HG. ESXEE OH THE
$133 G? ?E I A3EL. CIVIL JUEGE, {JR.D&},



snncams, maonns was rs-rrrzou yuan U/S 27(2) (r)
01' KB ACT 1.99%. 

T'!-I23 'H.R.R.P. comma or: FOR ADMI33I€3fl "1_'i¥IS
mm, was coax-r man: was 1rez.:.aw1sa:-  T'  

quautinn of whiz}: tha  

Respondent med 1'  27(2) (1')

of Karnamlm Rent has needs tin
premise’ 1’01’ The
premises fl: situntnd at
relationship between
the xmamd dilpma. Anczording m

he’ sans by name Padmalmr
petitioner being the landlord

_ awn humans!’ in his prams’ an.

the Courts below afber oomidemtian of the

on record rum csoncurrently mad that the

rd has pmued that I’m mad: the pa~en.unes’ fiar his

ruwn Wu.” vr .wummM ruun §.!..IyKI U2′ mxumnm mun coax? or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH court: or KARNATAKA RIG!-I

V3