High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Anish J S vs State Of Karnataka on 19 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Anish J S vs State Of Karnataka on 19 November, 2008
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri


3′ S333; A313,: Coma, the learned saunas: appearing fer ../11:11::

pefiiienar submits that the pzefifioner was working as aj}’_ V

Support E3:’3.gi13.€2c1′ for a muifinational software Ccmpé%iy,. M

Hawlefi Pa-skazd Company. He is in 310 -.fhé —

alleged czime, He submits that except theéf

there is no allegation against the “H{_: gig 5:933! ”

because the tsigphone calls ware €fX<3:15!E§~*'1;Eg':s'3§i '3£§§TS3§'¥?:£§11'hAi113. é,n£i the
n:3thz~::* a{*::11sed ;3ers3(:=ns< He petifioner has
beta}: in judicial c11stQfc_i§v' for tEiE'§$_§€ months: No
wc,=:22?0¥:1s WhatsficifflfLE};!"*;;.:%%?Ct);#§'¥%3d:V.:. K"'1'1%.*:"'.IV3Vfl:i1:i(:11t:1*. What is
I'£i'.C€}V!3I'!E'.d which clcms not form
part of the bczgy ralied ujgon the judgmnmt of
th:::- Hmzfhlc Sfigémme gage of Jayendm fimaswathi
swmial V5. 'fitgtg "fif reported in AIR 2005 SC ?'16 to
£10 svidantiaxy valuas can be attachad

t9 the} =m11;nimf§'?2s§af?:f:n§ints 0f thr: cg—3.ccr13.st:-:1.

_ 4' S111 ths icaxned High Court Gcvemmcat

' " £9: t11.e.%;2ésp43z1dcnt submits that the conspiracy is commit

. £!3c qtzestizm is hatshgd by the c9mp1a;ina:1}t'$ dzéxzsr

59814.

by’:

g} Ht?’ s;¥::.2.1l neat. 13393 the jz:z’i:~=:si.ietiz3:1 sf firm

2I;i1E§:r::1:$ its; prizgus gfimnission, ._

E5333. is; granted. ::9f_s1dii:§Qna1§}*,

VC:;’.’€S:1r:i: «T ‘